On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 09:50:30AM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> So people tracking woody previously should put now unstable or sid in their
> apt source file ?
if your intention is to track the unstable distribution then yes
change woody to unstable or sid. either will do as sid will never be
r
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:10:33PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > There's been a big reorganisation. woody is no longer called unstable (sid
> > is)
> > but testing. It's been reverted to the packages from potato and will be
>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I decided to upgrade to woody from potato. This was precipitated in part
> > by needing a new modutils; when i tried to manually install the deb from
> > woody, I found that it depended on a newer lib
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:21:49PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > There's been a big reorganisation. woody is no longer called unstable
> > > (sid is)
> > > but testing. It's been reverted to the packages from potato and will be
> > > filled
> > > up with packages from unstable which don't h
> > There's been a big reorganisation. woody is no longer called unstable (sid
> > is)
> > but testing. It's been reverted to the packages from potato and will be
> > filled
> > up with packages from unstable which don't have (too many) critical bugs. I
> > guess it's again a problem of the PPC a
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > There's been a big reorganisation. woody is no longer called unstable (sid
> > is) but testing. It's been reverted to the packages from potato and will
> > be filled up with packages from unstable which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I guess I'll just point apt at testing and
> wait for it to percolate through. --pm
That sounds like a very good plan to me.
Michel
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (p
Thanks for the clarification. I guess I'll just point apt at testing and
wait for it to percolate through. --pm
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Michel [iso-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> There's been a big reorganisation. woody is no longer called unstable (sid is)
> but testing. It's been reverted to the packages
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:48:53PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> There's been a big reorganisation. woody is no longer called unstable (sid is)
> but testing. It's been reverted to the packages from potato and will be filled
> up with packages from unstable which don't have (too many) critical bugs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I decided to upgrade to woody from potato. This was precipitated in part
> by needing a new modutils; when i tried to manually install the deb from
> woody, I found that it depended on a newer libc than what I had.
>
> Now, I was unable to find anything but the most v
10 matches
Mail list logo
