>Forget about it - just use 0.9.58, it supports the TiBook. Your diff works
>almost smoothly with the newer source as well :-)
>
>Except from TiBook support, it seems the changes from 0.9.57 are:
>
>* More than one mol running at a time (doesn't work yet, though)
Actually, multi-session support *i
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
> > IMHO the correct way of handling this is to recommend kernel-package
> > and provide instructions for building the modules both with and
> > without kernel-package.
>
> That's exactly what I was thinking of, thanks. Sorry i
Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > I have to admit I don't really care about this as I don't use kernel
> > nor module packages. All I'm asking for is not to impose a
> > dependency on either.
>
> IMHO the correct way of handling this is to recommend kernel-package
> and provide instructions for buildin
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Why put debian-mol-modules-source/ in the root? [...]
> debian-mol-modules-source/changelog.blanko lacks a newline in the end.
> I was hoping you would have made the module-source hooking into
> kernel-package to make building it semi-automatic. [...]
Right now,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Please don't depend on kernel-package though. It can easily pick up the
> > > correct tree for the running kernel if it's 2.4.x (and even current
> > > 2.2.x?) using /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build .
> >
> > I am not sure I understand you correctly (o
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > > I was hoping you would have made the module-source hooking into
> > > kernel-package to make building it semi-automatic. I haven't figured out
> > > yet just how to do it myself, but if n
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > I was hoping you would have made the module-source hooking into
> > kernel-package to make building it semi-automatic. I haven't figured out
> > yet just how to do it myself, but if not anything else you could maybe
> > sim
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I was hoping you would have made the module-source hooking into
> kernel-package to make building it semi-automatic. I haven't figured out
> yet just how to do it myself, but if not anything else you could maybe
> simply throw it into the TODO :-)
Please don't depend on
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I was hoping you would have made the module-source hooking into
> kernel-package to make building it semi-automatic. I haven't figured out
> yet just how to do it myself, but if not anything else you could maybe
> simply throw it into the TODO :-)
Mo
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Consider adding the following (just adding the file works out-of-the-box -
> or at least it did for me):
>
> --- mol-0.9.57.orig/lib/vmodes/tibook.modes
> +++ mol-0.9.57/lib/vmodes/tibook.modes
Forget about it - just use 0.9.58, it supports the TiBo
10 matches
Mail list logo
