> > No, the 2 things above are GPIOs (general purpose IO pins), that
> > apparently are used as interrupts.
>
> Can you point me to any documentation on these GPIOs? I must admit that
> I've never heard of the term.
There isn't really any documentation. GPIO is a generic term for general
purpos
Hi,
> > I do not know any details, but under MacOS X someone managed to write
> > a fancy program which stabilises a window (i.e. the window does not
Yeah I have seen that as well.
> It's possible that the Apple driver just puts the sensor values in the
> IO Registery in which case the app just
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 09:57 +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hello Johannes,
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:30:12AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Jochen: You might want to add to your page that so far we don't know how
> > the acceleration sensor can be queried, it is reportedly I2C but I know
> > no
Hello Johannes,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:30:12AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Jochen: You might want to add to your page that so far we don't know how
> the acceleration sensor can be queried, it is reportedly I2C but I know
> nothing else.
Yes, now the the machine runs at full speed I may add
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 07:30 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 17:22 -0500, Marc Heckmann wrote:
>
> > works like a charm. Scaling down to 750 Mhz also works. thanks a bunch.
>
> Cool, thanks Ben. I'll be applying to mine as soon as it compiles for
> the first time (and runs). Th
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 17:22 -0500, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> works like a charm. Scaling down to 750 Mhz also works. thanks a bunch.
Cool, thanks Ben. I'll be applying to mine as soon as it compiles for
the first time (and runs). Then I'll send a preliminary driver for the
touchpad, I think I can do
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:45:20AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Have you actually tried the patch ? The previous was just using "reg"
> property for the gpio offset, which is wrong, it should add 0x50 to it,
> which is what read_gpio() does...
Sorry, I probably suffered from hall
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 13:32 +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> diff -ur linux-2.6.11.4.orig/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S
> linux-2.6.11/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S
> --- linux-2.6.11.4.orig/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S 2005-03-02
> 07:38:26.0 +
> +++ linux-2.6.11/arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S 2005-03-
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 06:28:05PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 18:23 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 02:20 -0500, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any other patch that I can help test?
> >
> > Ah, I missed Jochen comments. C
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 06:28:05PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hrm... Indeed, the code looks bogus. Try replacing:
>
> reg = (u32 *)get_property(volt_gpio_np, "reg", NULL);
> voltage_gpio = *reg;
>
> With
>
> if (volt_gpio_np)
> voltage_gpio =
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 18:23 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 02:20 -0500, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wanted to confirm that on a PowerBook5,6 (post feb. 15"), the
> > cpu speed patch from the thread:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 02:20 -0500, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to confirm that on a PowerBook5,6 (post feb. 15"), the
> cpu speed patch from the thread:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/03/msg00554.html
>
> does not work work. It crashes the machine after "openpi
12 matches
Mail list logo
