Re: XFree86 4.0 on mach64/Lombard

2000-12-11 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > i dunno, are lombards supported under xfree4.0 > > I guess they should be, please post the exact error output. Depends on the kernel version; PCI resource fixup for the Mach64 is needed if you happen to boot via BootX. Michael

Re: XFree86 4.0 on mach64/Lombard

2000-12-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
steven alyari wrote: > i have downloaded xfree4 from the rsync tree listed at > > http://linuxppc.org/documentation/xf4/ > > and i use the "fbdev" driver for Section "Device" > > but when i startx all i get is a frozen black screen that is > unescapable.. ctrl+alt+backspace, ctrl-c, switching c

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-10 Thread Brendan J Simon
Michel Dänzer wrote: > > I didn't have any video options set. I set video=aty128fb in yaboot.conf > > but it doesn't make any difference. > You also need Option "UseFBDev" in XF86Config. I have the following: Section "Device" Identifier "Rage128" Driver "r128" Option "UseFBDev"

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brendan J Simon wrote: > > As Jack Howarths page says, mouse type should be "IMPS/2" still. > > Yes. Setting the mouse option to "imps/2" works on my G4. I thought the > docs for Xfree86 4.0 said that PS/2 is not supported for Linux (or was that > Linux98 ?). I use "PS/2" on my Athlon without

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-10 Thread Brendan J Simon
Tom Rini wrote: > > I didn't have any video options set. I set video=aty128fb in yaboot.conf > > but it > > doesn't make any difference. I get the bright green screen. When I change > > video > > modes with ctrl-alt-+ I can see that the resolution changes but the > > background > > turns to

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 08:06:44PM +1000, Brendan J Simon wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > Do I need a kernel parameter option ? ie. video= ? > > > No, I assume you're already using aty128fb. > > I didn't have any video options set. I set video=aty128fb in yaboot.conf but > it > doesn't m

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Tom Rini wrote: > Nope. Right now in 2.3.99preX (and for a while before) all usb mice look the > same. With the evdev stuff, usb stuff looks even more the same (no more > keycode translations). BTW, type "auto" doesn't seem to be too happy anywhere > (friend of mine on x86 warned me against usi

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Sven LUTHER wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 10:52:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > > but when i enter a bad login in gdm, the gdm requester shivers from right > > > to > > > left and vice versa, about 10-20 pixels, becoming less, before > > > stabilizing. > > >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 05:44:33PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > The X server does get further on the G4. It recognises the video > > chip fine but it gets stuck with the pointer and keyboard devices. > > I went to the XFree86 Australian mirror and read the online doc

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brendan J Simon wrote: > The X server does get further on the G4. It recognises the video > chip fine but it gets stuck with the pointer and keyboard devices. > I went to the XFree86 Australian mirror and read the online documentation > for 4.0. It says for USB mouse to use either "usb" or "auto

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 09:51:56AM +1000, Brendan J Simon wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > How recent a kernel do I need ? One from CVS ? > > > I am using the one from Ben H's site (vmlinux-2.2.15pre14). > > > > For a mach64 chip, you might need a 2.3.x kernel - don't know exactly. > > > > B

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 10:52:12AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > but when i enter a bad login in gdm, the gdm requester shivers from right to > > left and vice versa, about 10-20 pixels, becoming less, before stabilizing. > > Did you already encounter such a problem ? >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Sven LUTHER wrote: > but when i enter a bad login in gdm, the gdm requester shivers from right to > left and vice versa, about 10-20 pixels, becoming less, before stabilizing. > Did you already encounter such a problem ? To quote Microsoft, "That's not a bug, it's a feature." I think it's kind o

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Michel Dänzer wrote: > > How recent a kernel do I need ? One from CVS ? > > I am using the one from Ben H's site (vmlinux-2.2.15pre14). > > For a mach64 chip, you might need a 2.3.x kernel - don't know exactly. > > But as you have a Rage128, it doesn't matter, you can use the fbdev driver > (unti

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brendan J Simon wrote: > > If it's in fact from the mach64 family, you'll have to use the fbdev > > driver for now - you might need a recent kernel which corrects broken OF > > PCI memory ranges from though. > > How recent a kernel do I need ? One from CVS ? > I am using the one from Ben H's sit

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Michel Dänzer wrote: > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ > > 0xa400/26, 0xa000/14, I/O @ 0x0400/8 > > Are you sure the chip in those Notebooks is from the Rage128 family? Yep. It is a Rage 128 Mobility chip. > If it's in fact from the mach64 family, you

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 01:39:11PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Sven LUTHER wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ ^^ > > > 0xa400/26, 0xa000/14, I/O @ 0x0400/8 > > >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > > > (WW) r128: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:16:0) > > > > found > > > > (EE) No devices detected. > > > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ > > 0xa4

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > (WW) r128: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:16:0) > > > found > > > (EE) No devices detected. > > (--) PCI: (0:16:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c46) rev 2, Mem @ > 0xa400/26, 0xa000/14, I/O @ 0x0400/8 Are you sure the chip in those Notebo

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Does this work on the new Apple PowerBook (the one with FireWire) ? I have installed the XFree86 4.0 server and get the following errors in the log file. It seems to be looking at "BusID PCI:0:16:0: even though the XF86Config expicitly states "BusID 0:1:0". Can someone post a working XF86Config f

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-09 Thread Brendan J Simon
Nelson Abramson wrote: > Brendan J Simon wrote: > > > Does this work on the new Apple PowerBook (the one with FireWire) ? > > I have installed the XFree86 4.0 server and get the following errors in the > > log file. > > It seems to be looking at "BusID PCI:0:16:0: even though the XF86Config > >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-08 Thread Nelson Abramson
Brendan J Simon wrote: > Does this work on the new Apple PowerBook (the one with FireWire) ? > I have installed the XFree86 4.0 server and get the following errors in the > log file. > It seems to be looking at "BusID PCI:0:16:0: even though the XF86Config > expicitly states > "BusID 0:1:0". >

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
> Changes since 3.9.18: > > - contains experimental support for the Xv extension, try > http://n.ethz.ch/student/daenzerm/download/mpeg2play > (don't forget the -b switch and maximizing the window :) > Thanks to Michael Schimek for his code. Unfortunately, I seem to have included an old

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
Alan Buxey wrote: > > http://n.ethz.ch/student/daenzerm/download/XFree86/4.0/ > > if I am to update my current server, what files do I need to download, > should I just grab all of them? According to the readmes, you don't really need -include- and -libs- ;) > PS Is the glx version now working

Re: XFree86 4.0 binaries

2000-05-08 Thread Alan Buxey
hi, > http://n.ethz.ch/student/daenzerm/download/XFree86/4.0/ if I am to update my current server, what files do I need to download, should I just grab all of them? PS Is the glx version now working i believe 3.9.18 didnt work? alan

Re: XFree86 4.0

2000-03-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
Logan Hall wrote: > I see that XFree86 4.0 has been released. Does this release include accel > for the Mach64 chips in the Biege G3's? IIRC there has been rudimental accel support (screen to screen copies) for Mach64 added recently, but I doubt the driver works on PPC, at least hardly without t