Re: X performance

2003-11-11 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du mardi 11 novembre 2003, vers 02:14, Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> DivX is 640x480. The problem is : why X is taking 40% of proc (and >> mplayer 50%) ? With xvidix, X only takes 5% (I suppose it is not >> sollicited) and mplayer takes 55%. > Are

Re: X performance

2003-11-11 Thread Guido Guenther
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:00:45AM -0800, Vincent Bernat wrote: > DivX is 640x480. The problem is : why X is taking 40% of proc (and > mplayer 50%) ? With xvidix, X only takes 5% (I suppose it is not > sollicited) and mplayer takes 55%. Are you using -vo xv? X eats up much more CPU time if you use

Re: X performance

2003-11-11 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du lundi 10 novembre 2003, vers 23:48, Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: >> I have tried a top while playing a big DivX with mplayer and X server >> takes 40% of the CPU (iBook 700, M6, using xvideo). Is it normal to >> take such a part

Re: X performance

2003-11-11 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 08:26, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Hello ! > > I have tried a top while playing a big DivX with mplayer and X server > takes 40% of the CPU (iBook 700, M6, using xvideo). Is it normal to > take such a part of the proc ? big divx's can not be playable even on a 2GHz athlonXP... s