On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:26:56PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 12:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >atlas FTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one
> >bzr #760054 - Not specific to ppc64el
> >gaucheFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for
On 09/16/2014 12:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
atlas FTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one
bzr #760054 - Not specific to ppc64el
gaucheFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one
gccxmlFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:48:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> A quick note about this one. Andi Barth has started to debug that, and
> I have continued a bit. The following code doesn't work correctly on
> ppc64el, printing twice a positive value.
This exact behaviour is tested in the boost te
On 09/16/2014 01:08 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
>libkolabxml FTBFS, seems to be a problem with boost::math::changesign
[...]
For this one, I'm asking someone who should known Boost for ppc64/el well.
Submitted #761926 (boost1.55) and #761934 (libkolabxml symbols).
--
Mauricio Far
On 09/16/2014 12:48 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>bugs). We should still try to fix them if possible. I have tried to
>identify packages that are important either because of the
>functionality they provide or because the number of packages which
>build-depends on them. Here is a first list:
Many t
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:45:45PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On the packages side the status is quite good and a big part of the
> build failures are for leaf packages that might not fully necessary for
> the release (and some of them also will not be in Jessie as they have RC
> bugs). We shou
6 matches
Mail list logo
