> >
> > Now I have installed the '1.2.8old -> 1.2.8new' update from apple.com,
> > however still no change. Not a single of my old 2.6 images (that have
> > been running for a month or so) would boot anymore.
> >
> > I suspect that apple somehow did a hidden openfirmare upgrade in that
> > MacOS u
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
My mac autoupdated to 10.2.8. Debian Linux still boots fine for me.
I have a Dual 533Mhz Snakebite G4.
Fred
Hi all,
This is just a warning message for those having a Mac OS X and Linux
install on the same machine.
Details:
This is what I have:
cpu : 7455,
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Michel D�er wrote:
> On Fre, 2003-10-10 at 23:17, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > "Restart the computer and hold down the four keys
> > command + option + O + F. This puts you into OpenFirmware, which is a
> > kind of boot monitor. At the OpenFirmware prompt, type the follow
On Fre, 2003-10-10 at 23:17, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> "Restart the computer and hold down the four keys
> command + option + O + F. This puts you into OpenFirmware, which is a
> kind of boot monitor. At the OpenFirmware prompt, type the following:
> boot hd:9,yaboot
>
> The digit in this com
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~branden/ibook/
>
> Excerpt:
> "Restart the computer and hold down the four keys
> command + option + O + F. This puts you into OpenFirmware, which is a
> kind of boot monitor. At the OpenFirmware prompt, type the following:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Michel D�er wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:14, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > My idea would be to mount the non-booting Debian partition with a
> > Debian Installer CD and then chroot into this Debian system [...]
>
> Or just download a known working (and preferably non-m
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 17:14, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> My idea would be to mount the non-booting Debian partition with a
> Debian Installer CD and then chroot into this Debian system [...]
Or just download a known working (and preferably non-modular :) kernel
(and yaboot, if necessary) to a
Hi Mike,
First my apologies for answering a bit late.
Sorry, Mike, if you already know the following: I simply posted it
just in case someone else, too, (including myself sooner or later :)
might want to read this when searching Google ... :)
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Michael Lake wrote:
> Wolfgang Pf
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 06:09:11AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:54:50PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > > No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
> > > >
> > > > CC'ing Tom Rini, hoping he knows something.
> > >
> > > AFAIK, all of the mirrors are OK.
> > Seconded. linuxppc-2.5 works fine enough on the Lombard but rivafb seems
> > broken on imac2.
>
> I haven't worked on 2.5 rivafb at all. I don't even know if it has my
> updates to the 2.4 version (I brought a bunch of updates from XFree).
Perhaps not. Looks like the depth gets initialized wro
Hi,
Tom Rini writes:
> > linuxppc-2.5-benh is stuck at -test2.
>
> Bah. And right now I can't connect to bkbits.net from anywhere.
Use rsync.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de::linux-2.5-benh for the time being :)
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz
> 2.4.22-ben2 isn't all golden either - the console is fine but X (testing,
> nv driver) crashes the machine hard. Last working version was 2.4.20-pre4
> IIRC.
The kernel has nothing to do with "nv" driver, the "nv" driver in
testing is old and won't work properly on most PPC. The one in the
curr
> > > > No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
> >
> > CC'ing Tom Rini, hoping he knows something.
>
> AFAIK, all of the mirrors are OK. What ones aren't?
linuxppc-2.5-benh is stuck at -test2.
Michael
> > Well, since I track that tree anyway, I set up a mirror at
> > rsync.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de::benh/, which I hope to keep
> > current in a timely manner [1]. Ben, please let me know whether you
> > approve of this in general and whether the name is okay in particular.
> > Everybody else
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 14:54, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Well, since I track that tree anyway, I set up a mirror at
> > > rsync.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de::benh/, which I hope to keep
> > > current in a timely manner [1]. Ben, please let me know whether you
> > > approve of this in general an
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 13:16, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
> Michel Dänzer writes:
>
> > Could you change the name from benh to linuxppc-2.5-benh to match
> > the BK tree and other mirror(s), and could you exclude BK stuff
> > (BitKeeper/ and SCCS/ directories AFAICT)?
>
> Sure.
Thank you.
--
Ear
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:54:50PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
> > >
> > > CC'ing Tom Rini, hoping he knows something.
> >
> > AFAIK, all of the mirrors are OK. What ones aren't?
>
> linuxppc-2.5-benh is stuck at -test2.
Bah. A
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:09:00PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>
> > > > the rsync mirror must have trouble
>
> > > Who is responsible for the rsync mirror? Did you already inform him?
>
> > No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
>
>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:12:35PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 12:09, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> >
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> >
> > > > > the rsync mirror must have trouble
> >
> > > > Who is responsible for the rsync mirror? Did you already inform him?
> >
> >
Hi,
Michel Dänzer writes:
> Could you change the name from benh to linuxppc-2.5-benh to match
> the BK tree and other mirror(s), and could you exclude BK stuff
> (BitKeeper/ and SCCS/ directories AFAICT)?
Sure.
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz j
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 12:09, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>
> > > > the rsync mirror must have trouble
>
> > > Who is responsible for the rsync mirror? Did you already inform him?
>
> > No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
CC'ing Tom Rini, hopin
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 12:09, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
>
> > > > the rsync mirror must have trouble
>
> > > Who is responsible for the rsync mirror? Did you already inform him?
>
> > No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
>
> Well, since
Hi,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> > > the rsync mirror must have trouble
> > Who is responsible for the rsync mirror? Did you already inform him?
> No. I don't really know who takes care of those mirrors
Well, since I track that tree anyway, I set up a mirror at
rsync.theorie.physik.uni-mu
> Is it a known issue that the 2.6.0-test6 from the above source as of
> yesterday evening (CET) cannot reload the audio modules (neither alsa
> nor dmasound) once they've been unloaded? At least alsa also does not
> survive a sleepmode session, which means sound is dead after a snooze.
>
> $ sud
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 05:50, Nick Lopez wrote:
>
> Just throwing in my experiance so the scope of the problem is a little
> clearer, I hope.
Thanks, but I think it's been clear for a while...
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusi
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 10:17, Harald Welte wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:41:10PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> > the rsync mirror must have trouble, it's at 2.6.0-test6
>> >
>> > (bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.5-benh)
>>
>> th
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 10:17, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:41:10PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > the rsync mirror must have trouble, it's at 2.6.0-test6
> >
> > (bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.5-benh)
>
> thanks, but I still refuse to use prorpietary tools for develo
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:41:10PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> the rsync mirror must have trouble, it's at 2.6.0-test6
>
> (bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc-2.5-benh)
thanks, but I still refuse to use prorpietary tools for development.
Who is responsible for the rsync mirror? Did you alr
Me too!
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:30:31AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:22:44AM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> same machine here, with 512MB ram and revision '3.3'
iBook, 500Mhz, 640M
> > I'm running Debian 3.0.r.1 (testing/unstable) on the same hard disk
> > wher
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 18:32, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:08:35PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > My current 2.6 should work too, the problem is with cpufreq. They
> > seem to have updated the PMU firmware indeed and it no longer accept
> > a protocol violation that was
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:08:35PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> My current 2.6 should work too, the problem is with cpufreq. They
> seem to have updated the PMU firmware indeed and it no longer accept
> a protocol violation that was triggered by the cpufreq code (and the
> sleep code occa
>
> Now I have installed the '1.2.8old -> 1.2.8new' update from apple.com,
> however still no change. Not a single of my old 2.6 images (that have
> been running for a month or so) would boot anymore.
>
> I suspect that apple somehow did a hidden openfirmare upgrade in that
> MacOS upgrade.
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:22:44AM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> This is what I have:
> cpu : 7455, altivec supported
> clock : 667MHz
> revision: 3.2 (pvr 8001 0302)
> bogomips: 665.19
> machine : PowerBook3,5
> motherboard : PowerBook3,5 MacRI
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Hi all,
This is just a warning message for those having a Mac OS X and Linux
install on the same machine.
Yesterday I installed the Mac OS X 10.2.8 upgrade to the machine
above: After this, I couldn't boot again to my default kernel which at
this time was 2.4.21-b
34 matches
Mail list logo
