On 2/3/21 7:28 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 2/3/21 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> The MDB is still corrupted, so I have to look into that:
>
> And fixed:
Just uploaded the patched version of hfsprogs to unstable:
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hfsprogs/news/2021020
On 2021-02-03 19:28:45 +0100 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
On 2/3/21 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
The MDB is still corrupted, so I have to look into that:
And fixed:
Great work, thank you!
Johannes
On 2/3/21 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> The MDB is still corrupted, so I have to look into that:
And fixed:
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> ./newfs_hfs -h /dev/sdl2
Initialized /dev/sdl2 as a 3863 MB HFS volume
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> fsck.hfs /dev/sdl2
** /dev/sdl2
On 2/3/21 4:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 2/3/21 4:21 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 2/3/21 2:52 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> I quickly hacked that together now, but it's not really working yet as some
>>> size
>>> calculations are incorrect:
>>
>> Works:
>
On 2/3/21 4:21 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 2/3/21 2:52 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> I quickly hacked that together now, but it's not really working yet as some
>> size
>> calculations are incorrect:
>
> Works:
In case someone is interested, attaching the preliminary patc
On 2/3/21 4:06 PM, Linux User #330250 wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier to use an earlier version of diskdev_cmds, patch
> it to default to hfs instead of hfs+, compile it, and then rename it to
> mkfs.hfs as a separate package?
>
> https://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/diskdev_cmds/
>
> On Gentoo L
On 2/3/21 2:52 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I quickly hacked that together now, but it's not really working yet as some
> size
> calculations are incorrect:
Works:
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> ./newfs_hfs -h /dev/sdl2
Initialized /dev/sdl2 as a 3863 MB HFS volume
root@z6:..hfspr
Wouldn't it be easier to use an earlier version of diskdev_cmds, patch
it to default to hfs instead of hfs+, compile it, and then rename it to
mkfs.hfs as a separate package?
https://opensource.apple.com/tarballs/diskdev_cmds/
On Gentoo Linux, version 332.14 is still fully supporting HFS. (At le
On 2/3/21 2:52 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I quickly hacked that together now, but it's not really working yet as some
> size
> calculations are incorrect:
Some more progress:
root@z6:..hfsprogs/newfs_hfs.tproj> ./newfs_hfs -h /dev/sdl2
Initialized /dev/sdl2 as a 3863 MB HFS volume
ro
On 2/3/21 12:41 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> OK, I have skimmed through the hfsprogs source again and I think, I will
> re-add HFS Legacy support. It should be feasible to add it back in as most
> of the functionality is still there.
>
> There are some extra functions that were removed a
On 2/3/21 12:16 PM, Linux User #330250 wrote:
> BUT, one "bug" of this has always been, even with an older version of
> the Apple diskdev_cmds, that the option "-h hfs" was always needed.
> Therefor, those two command do the same to create an HFS+ volume:
> * mkfs.hfsplus /dev/sdxn
> * mkfs.hfs /de
On 2/3/21 12:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> No, they don't. Again, Apple removed Legacy HFS support from mkfs.hfs.
>
> If someone actually wants to step up and help me, then please wipe
> up a patch to bring HFS Legacy support back to hfsprogs.
OK, I have skimmed through the hfsprogs s
On 2/3/21 12:16 PM, Linux User #330250 wrote:
> Which file systems are supported by Open Firmware?
>
> Keeping in mind that there are significant differences from OldWorld
> (Open Firmware prior to version 3) to NewWorld (Open Firmware starting
> with version 3) Macs, every Mac does support bootin
Am 02.02.21 um 22:17 schrieb Christian Groessler:
I need to ask now...
On 2/2/21 9:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Yes, and that libhfsp-dev is actually built from the hfsplus source
package which is a
fork of hfsutils to support HFS+ but it doesn't have a hattrib command
anymore which
I need to ask now...
On 2/2/21 9:43 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Yes, and that libhfsp-dev is actually built from the hfsplus source package
which is a
fork of hfsutils to support HFS+ but it doesn't have a hattrib command anymore
which
is used in hfsutils to bless a file system folde
On 2/2/21 8:59 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Also OpenBIOS has its own fairly compact HFS+ driver at
> https://github.com/openbios/\
> openbios/tree/master/fs/hfsplus which according to the comments is taken from
> libhfsp
> which still seems to be available in Debian:
> https://packages.debian.
On 02/02/2021 19:39, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
- Use HFS+ with hfsprogs and write a blessing tool based on libisofs [2]
The code was contributed by Vladimir Serbinenko in 2012, when he was
the active maintainer of GRUB. See:
https://dev.lovelyhq.com/libbu
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> - Use HFS+ with hfsprogs and write a blessing tool based on libisofs [2]
The code was contributed by Vladimir Serbinenko in 2012, when he was
the active maintainer of GRUB. See:
https://dev.lovelyhq.com/libburnia/libisofs/raw/branch/master/libisofs/hfsplu
On 2/2/21 8:22 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> We could try re-adding HFS Legacy support to hfsprogs [1] which should
> be feasible as well.
This particular plan would involve:
- re-add HFS Legacy support to hfsprogs
- create hfsprogs udeb package
- create hfsutils udeb package
Since this
On 2/2/21 8:15 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> As I explained, from the installer's point of view, hfsprogs is more straight-
> forward because it use the same command line interface as all the other
> filesystem
> utilities, so that "mkfs -t hfs" works.
>
> hfsutils uses "hformat $DEVICE"
Hello Johannes!
On 2/2/21 7:51 PM, Johannes Brakensiek wrote:
>> On a sidenote: This variant has the huge advantage that the partioning tool
>> in debian-installer takes care of setting up the HFS+ partition and making
>> sure nothing gets overwritten etc.
>>
>> This is something that we would hav
Hello Adrian,
thank you for your work and your approach towards fixing this issue.
On 2 Feb 2021, at 16:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 2/2/21 4:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
In order to solve this issue, we have a couple of options:
- Use HFS instead of HFS+ and use the o
On 2/2/21 4:24 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> In order to solve this issue, we have a couple of options:
>
> - Use HFS instead of HFS+ and use the old hformat utility in grub-installer
On a sidenote: This variant has the huge advantage that the partioning tool
in debian-installer takes ca
23 matches
Mail list logo
