Re: Segfault on apt-get (sarge)

2003-11-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 02:01, Ken Treis wrote: > > Reading Package Lists... 0% > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x0ffb0094 in > pkgCacheGenerator::ListParser::NewDepends(pkgCache::VerIterator, > std::string, std::string, unsigned, unsigned) () from > /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-l

Re: Segfault on apt-get (sarge)

2003-11-18 Thread Ken Treis
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Usually libc6 is too blame. If you still have the old one in /var/cache/apt/archives/ (or can get it on the box) just reinstall it manually. Tried rolling back to libc6_2.3.2-9, but that didn't help. I'm not exactly sure what I was running before, and of course I did

Re: Segfault on apt-get (sarge)

2003-11-18 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Ken Treis wrote: > I just upgraded one of my briQ-based servers to the latest from sarge, > and now I get segmentation faults when apt reads package lists: > > # apt-get update > [various sites hit] > Fetched 7066B in 0s (7482B/s) > Segmentation faultsts... 1% > > # apt-cach

Re: Segfault on apt-get (sarge)

2003-11-18 Thread Joe Malik
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:43:52AM -0800, Ken Treis wrote: > I just upgraded one of my briQ-based servers to the latest from sarge, > and now I get segmentation faults when apt reads package lists: > > # apt-get update > [various sites hit] > Fetched 7066B in 0s (7482B/s) > Segmentation faultsts.

Re: Segfault on apt-get (sarge)

2003-11-18 Thread Lukas Ruf
> Ken Treis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-18 19:11]: > > I just upgraded one of my briQ-based servers to the latest from sarge, > and now I get segmentation faults when apt reads package lists: > ... > > # apt-cache update > Segmentation fault > ... > I can still get files onto the system, and I ca