robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a similar problem requiring a reboot to reconnect on dsl about
> every three times. Rebooting fixes it each time.I have an eMac. The
> networking tool says the connection is active but I cannot get on
> line, no connection to the internet.
> Bob
>
Sinc
I have a similar problem requiring a reboot to reconnect on dsl about
every three times. Rebooting fixes it each time.I have an eMac. The
networking tool says the connection is active but I cannot get on line,
no connection to the internet.
Bob
--- Begin Message ---
Herminio Hernandez wrote:
Herminio Hernandez wrote:
Has any one had issues with thier network mananger? I have to constantly
renew dhcp manually. I am running debian lenny/sid on a powerbook g4.
I have same problem with my iMAC G3, I reported it(04/02/2007 06:25 AM)
while Etch was in testing and I have been living with
Has any one had issues with thier network mananger? I have to constantly
renew dhcp manually. I am running debian lenny/sid on a powerbook g4.
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 17:42 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 10 May 2007 14:32, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Adding to the request tracker.
Hi,
On Thursday 10 May 2007 14:32, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Adding to the request tracker. If nothing happens within ten days or so
> I'll ping DSA again, to make sure you can happily move and we keep our
> powerpc buildd :)
voltaire.d.o will be relocated this weekend :)
regards,
Holger
> > Re: hosting voltaire: if it could be shipped to Europe, I could host it
> > temporarily (couple of months for sure; any longer and I need to make
> > arrangements with my former lab mates) in the same server room that hosts
> > four m68k buildds already. I rather prefer another solution is foun
> That's all fine and dandy, but for your personal pet project you don't
> need machines sponsored to the Debian project, maintained by the
> Debian project and stuff. As you said, you own a G5 your own, so you
> can work on it.
>
> As long as there's no perspective for powerpc64 to be included
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:34:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> But I have another concern. In my experience, some debian source
> packages do not build on G5 running the Debian powerpc port because
> their ./configure scripts get confused by the "ppc64" string in the
> uname output. Depending o
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:23:34PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Oh thanks a lot, guys! Popping back into -powerpc to check what's new, and
> it's the same old flaming and name-calling. Sheesh. I'm just glad Dan
> doesn't read -powerpc anymore. Asking a simple but rather important
> question, and
> |> Why not ?
> |
> |Because the sky is not violet today.
>
> What a rediculous, senseless answer!
> Unbelieveable bad! I never did expect things like
> this in a project like debian. You seriously
> should think about your positions.
Oh thanks a lot, guys! Popping back into -powerpc to chec
Joey Schulze schrieb am Friday, 11. May 2007 um 11:02:26 +0200:
|Sven Luther wrote:
|> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
|> > Sven Luther wrote:
|> > > > > Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
|> > > > > multiarch powerpc port ?
|> > > >
|
Joey Schulze schrieb am Friday, 11. May 2007 um 09:27:01 +0200:
|Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debian
|powerpc64 machine?
First you need the computer, then you can start
porting.
Alles Gute
Helmut H. Franke
--
http://www.worte-des-lebens.net/Vaterworte/vaterworte.ht
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:34:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> although this thread is not mega-friedly, I think that it gives the
> opportunity to ask to the powerpc porters and buildd admins their
> opinion on wether Debian needs a G5 machine or not.
Notice that the augsbourg mac
Hi all,
although this thread is not mega-friedly, I think that it gives the
opportunity to ask to the powerpc porters and buildd admins their
opinion on wether Debian needs a G5 machine or not.
One first argument is that G5 is faster, and that it is not because the
current buildd was not overload
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:02:26AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > > > Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
> > > > > > multiarch powerpc port ?
> > > >
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > > Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
> > > > > multiarch powerpc port ?
> > > >
> > > > Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debia
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
> > > > multiarch powerpc port ?
> > >
> > > Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debian
> > > powerpc64 machine?
> >
Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
> > > multiarch powerpc port ?
> >
> > Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debian
> > powerpc64 machine?
>
> Well, there is andreas jochens pure-ppc64 effort eating loads of space on
do with those powerpc64 machines
> discussed in this thread.
Mmm, i may be wrong, but the subject still is :
Subject: Re: PowerPC buildd is looking for a new home
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:27:01AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > But basically, you are telling me that i should take my server, and fork
> > debian. Well, i guess given how i have been handled lately, i am
> > seriously considering this. The debian infrastructure guys probabl
Hi,
On Friday 11 May 2007 09:50, Ralf Saalmüller wrote:
> it's 20 day to go until the buildd for the debian powerpc port gets
> disconnected.
Yes, we know. But this has nothing to do with those powerpc64 machines
discussed in this thread.
regards,
Holger
pgpnMHEwZu69A.pgp
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello to Debian-PowerPC,
it's 20 day to go until the buildd for the debian powerpc port gets
disconnected.
To the people in charge: Please make your decision soon. To be able
to make the transit in time and to stop the discussion about it.
Th
Sven Luther wrote:
> But basically, you are telling me that i should take my server, and fork
> debian. Well, i guess given how i have been handled lately, i am
> seriously considering this. The debian infrastructure guys probably need
> some serious competition in order to be kept agile :)
If you
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:31:22AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > > The DSA team does not add random machines. There is no ppc64 port,
> > > there is no need for ppc64 machines, there are powerpc build daemons
> > > and there's a powerpc porter machine which is not overloaded.
Sven Luther wrote:
> > The DSA team does not add random machines. There is no ppc64 port,
> > there is no need for ppc64 machines, there are powerpc build daemons
> > and there's a powerpc porter machine which is not overloaded. Thus,
> > no need for more machines, thus no more machines will be a
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:25:18PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > But the DSA team have refused to even consider those augsbourg machines,
> > probably because they where overloaded, and unwilling to share the work,
> > a bit like it is happening with the arm or sparc ports, wh
Sven Luther wrote:
> But the DSA team have refused to even consider those augsbourg machines,
> probably because they where overloaded, and unwilling to share the work,
> a bit like it is happening with the arm or sparc ports, where new
> hardware was proposed, but ignored or rejected.
Thanks Sven
Hi,
On Thursday 10 May 2007 12:56, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > When do you move? (As in, until when the machine needs to be moved?)
> By the beginning of June.
Adding to the request tracker. If nothing happens within ten days or so I'll
ping DSA again, to make sure you can happily move and we k
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:53:56AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 22:49, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > voltaire.debian.org, our venerable but still reliable build daemon,
> > has been living in my apartment for a number of years. I'm moving
> > house shortly,
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 22:49, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> voltaire.debian.org, our venerable but still reliable build daemon,
> has been living in my apartment for a number of years. I'm moving
> house shortly, though, and won't be able to host it in my new home.
> So it needs a new g
> |
> |I have been running the Solaris project Blastwave.org for five years
> |and it would be trivial to add in one more machine.
> |
> |I'm in Canada however.
> |
> |Dennis
>
a bit like it is happening with the arm or sparc ports, where new
hardware was proposed, but ignored or rejected.
I
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:22:23PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Mabye a DD could use the request tracker to deal with these issues?
>
> https://rt.debian.org/ (guest/readonly)
>
> Have a nice day,
>
Please, DDs,
use the request tracker; we should stick to the pro
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:45:21AM +0200, Helmut H. Franke wrote:
> > May be you debian people want to have a look at
> > http://tuxppc.rz.uni-augsburg.de/ and contact the people there. I am
> > not quite sure though, but I think and maybe they already run a
> > buildd at one of their ppc 64 serv
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:45:21AM +0200, Helmut H. Franke wrote:
> Dennis Clarke schrieb am Wednesday, 09. May 2007 um 20:46:04 -0400:
> |On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |>> voltaire.debian.org, our venerable but still reliable build daemon,
> |>> has been living in my ap
Helmut H. Franke schrieb am Thursday, 10. May 2007 um 03:45:21 +0200:
|Dennis Clarke schrieb am Wednesday, 09. May 2007 um 20:46:04 -0400:
||On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
||>> voltaire.debian.org, our venerable but still reliable build daemon,
||>> has been living in my ap
Dennis Clarke schrieb am Wednesday, 09. May 2007 um 20:46:04 -0400:
|On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|>> voltaire.debian.org, our venerable but still reliable build daemon,
|>> has been living in my apartment for a number of years. I'm moving
|>> house shortly, though, and
On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> voltaire.debian.org, our venerable but still reliable build daemon,
> has been living in my apartment for a number of years. I'm moving
> house shortly, though, and won't be able to host it in my new home.
> So it needs a new guardian.
> voltaire.debian.org, our venerable but still reliable build daemon,
> has been living in my apartment for a number of years. I'm moving
> house shortly, though, and won't be able to host it in my new home.
> So it needs a new guardian.
>
> It's a standard PowerMac G4 case. About all it needs is
38 matches
Mail list logo
