Re: OT: dns zone transfer (was: public key is not available)

2006-01-19 Thread Ismael Valladolid Torres
Hans Ekbrand escribe: > I took the "host -l pgp.net"-method from the default .gnupg/options, is > there anything wrong with that method? Yes. It works for very few people. I'm at Spain and I always use pgp.rediris.es which is very complete and transfers very fast. I encourage people to guess whic

Re: OT: dns zone transfer (was: public key is not available)

2006-01-19 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > His nameserver doesn't need to be broken, your's might very well be. > > > His nameserver refuses to answer a zone transfer request (9 NOAUTH) > > > because it's not authoritative on that zone (that's absolutely correct > > > behaviour). > > > > OK I'll take your word for that my DNS is broke

Re: OT: dns zone transfer (was: public key is not available)

2006-01-18 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:30:31PM +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:53:46PM +0100, Kiko Piris wrote: > > On 18/01/2006 at 22:16 +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote: > > > > > pgp.net is not a host, it's a zone. My guess is that your nameserver > > > is broken, but I'm no DNS guru. > >

Re: OT: dns zone transfer (was: public key is not available)

2006-01-18 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:53:46PM +0100, Kiko Piris wrote: > On 18/01/2006 at 22:16 +0100, Hans Ekbrand wrote: > > > pgp.net is not a host, it's a zone. My guess is that your nameserver > > is broken, but I'm no DNS guru. > > > > Here are some of the servers that my nameserver replies to the abo