On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:33:32AM -0700, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> So perhaps the statement needs to be something like
>
> "For users of the powerpc flavour a 2.4 kernel is also provided to
> support Amiga Power-UP (apus) systems, and as a fall back for users
> with external kernel modules that are
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:24:23PM -0700, Shyamal Prasad
Sven> wrote:
>> the G4) you also have the option of choosing a 2.4 kernel in
>> case your hardware is really old. However most hardware built
>> after 2001 sho
> "Rogério" == Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rogério> On Oct 22 2005, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
>> as +little as 600 to 700M for a really basic system, but you'll
Rogério> I question the 600 to 700M figures for a "really basic
Rogério> system". I think that these numbe
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:24:23PM -0700, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> http://www.us.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/pmac is quite out of
> date. I use new Mac hardware (G5), and have little experience with
> minimal installs of Debian since potato. Comments on the patch below
> would be a
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 07:24:23PM -0700, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> http://www.us.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/pmac is quite out of
> date. I use new Mac hardware (G5), and have little experience with
> minimal installs of Debian since potato. Comments on the patch below
> would be appreciate
On Oct 22 2005, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> +1G is probably a realistic minimum disk space required for an
> +experimental Linux system. You might get by with less, perhaps as
> +little as 600 to 700M for a really basic system, but you'll more than
> +likely want more than just the basics.
I question
6 matches
Mail list logo
