On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:37:57AM -0800, Adam Done wrote:
> The root=/dev/hda9 is the actuall root partition now (i had switched the
> hds from hde being the first drive to hda to the first drive)
shot in the dark. try
root=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part9
==rob
--
Rob Latham
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 19:06, Stewart Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 12:05, Adam Done wrote:
> Thanks.. I had a working kernel for the xserv but lost the config file
> for the 2.4.22 kernel. That would be greate if you could. I was also
> hoping to get the 2.6 to work because I really ne
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 08:59, fleny68 wrote:
Le Jeudi 20 Novembre 2003 09:22, Adam Done a écrit :
> On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 00:10, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > VFS: Cannot open root device "hde9" or unknown-block(0,0)
> > > Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> > > Kerel panic: VFS: Unab
Le Jeudi 20 Novembre 2003 09:22, Adam Done a écrit :
> On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 00:10, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > VFS: Cannot open root device "hde9" or unknown-block(0,0)
> > > Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> > > Kerel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
> > > <0
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 22:23, Adam Done wrote:
The Complie went very well and compiled it without smp frist to make sure it runs. When I do I get this:
Started krxtimod 15
Started krxiod 16
Started krxsecd 17
VFS: Cannot open root device "hde9" or unknown-bl
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 00:10, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> VFS: Cannot open root device "hde9" or unknown-block(0,0)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> Kerel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
> <0>Rebooting in 180 seconds...
Looks like the probe order of IDE in
> VFS: Cannot open root device "hde9" or unknown-block(0,0)
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> Kerel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
> <0>Rebooting in 180 seconds...
Looks like the probe order of IDE interfaces got reversed, Ben?
Michael
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 02:19, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:24, Adam Done wrote:
> OK,
>
> I am totally at a loss. I am having the bigest and toughest problem
> trying to complie a working kernel for the xserv. I have been working
> on this straight since last friday
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 02:19, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:24, Adam Done wrote:
> OK,
>
> I am totally at a loss. I am having the bigest and toughest problem
> trying to complie a working kernel for the xserv. I have been working
> on this straight since last friday
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Adam Done wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 02:19, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > Tried my tree with a pmac_defconfig ? (then eventually turning on SMP)
>
> Yes, I rsync but what do you mean with pmac_defconfig? Was I suposed
> to turn something off first?
just that pma
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 02:19, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:24, Adam Done wrote:
> OK,
>
> I am totally at a loss. I am having the bigest and toughest problem
> trying to complie a working kernel for the xserv. I have been working
> on this straight since last friday
Hi,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes
> Tried my tree with a pmac_defconfig ? (then eventually turning on SMP)
>
> rsync from source.mvista.com::linuxppc-2.5-benh
rsync.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de::linuxppc-2.5-benh is up-to-date
again now. And it seems to me that arch/ppc/platforms/pmac_featur
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:24, Adam Done wrote:
> OK,
>
> I am totally at a loss. I am having the bigest and toughest problem
> trying to complie a working kernel for the xserv. I have been working
> on this straight since last friday and lost a lot of sleep trying to
> figure the right combo to h
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 17:05, Adam Done wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 16:49, Ken Treis wrote:
Adam Done wrote:
> I am totally at a loss. I am having the bigest and toughest problem
> trying to complie a working kernel for the xserv. I have been working
> on this straight since la
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 12:05, Adam Done wrote:
> Thanks.. I had a working kernel for the xserv but lost the config file
> for the 2.4.22 kernel. That would be greate if you could. I was also
> hoping to get the 2.6 to work because I really need to get xfs and afs
> to work and I have not been able
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 16:49, Ken Treis wrote:
Adam Done wrote:
> I am totally at a loss. I am having the bigest and toughest problem
> trying to complie a working kernel for the xserv. I have been working
> on this straight since last friday and lost a lot of sleep trying to
> figure the
Adam Done wrote:
I am totally at a loss. I am having the bigest and toughest problem
trying to complie a working kernel for the xserv. I have been working
on this straight since last friday and lost a lot of sleep trying to
figure the right combo to have a working kernel. Has anyone have an
17 matches
Mail list logo
