Re: /dev/psaux (was: Re: [SOLVED] status of udev on powerpc)

2004-03-24 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 09:26, Ole-Egil Hvitmyren wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 03:02, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > > >>Minor gotcha: I switched the X mouse device from /dev/gpmdata (I had gpm > >>repeat mouse events) to /dev/input/mice, because I remember reading that > >>w

/dev/psaux (was: Re: [SOLVED] status of udev on powerpc)

2004-03-24 Thread Ole-Egil Hvitmyren
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 03:02, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: Minor gotcha: I switched the X mouse device from /dev/gpmdata (I had gpm repeat mouse events) to /dev/input/mice, because I remember reading that with the new 2.6 kernel more than one processes can listen to mouse events

Re: [SOLVED] status of udev on powerpc

2004-03-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 03:29, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > the mouse will not work until I move the pad a couple of seconds. > > > > > > Anybody experiencing the same problem? > > > > No. What protocol do you use? This might be expected behaviour with > > "auto". > >

Re: [SOLVED] status of udev on powerpc

2004-03-23 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > and because udev did not create the gpmdata device node. Now, > > the mouse will not work until I move the pad a couple of seconds. > > > > Anybody experiencing the same problem? > > No. What protocol do you use? This might be expected behaviour with > "auto". Act

Re: [SOLVED] status of udev on powerpc

2004-03-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 03:02, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > Minor gotcha: I switched the X mouse device from /dev/gpmdata (I had gpm > repeat mouse events) to /dev/input/mice, because I remember reading that > with the new 2.6 kernel more than one processes can listen to mouse > events /dev/input/m