On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 16:16, Joshua Narins wrote:
> Amazing ,Ben, per usual.
>
> Was there an explanation offered before how something like cpufreq and a Mac
> OS upgrade could be in conflict with each other?
>
> If not, I would be interested in knowing.
The problem was related to some subtle
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 20:22, Georg Koss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to start I'm back in Sarge with my PBG4 12".
>
> Finally it was Ben's hint which made the day a red-letter day.
>
> For the records: So I rsynced 2.4.23-pre5-ben0, compiled it monolithic
> without that CPU-frequency scaling option.
> I re
On (19/10/03 20:22), Georg Koss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to start I'm back in Sarge with my PBG4 12".
>
> Finally it was Ben's hint which made the day a red-letter day.
>
> For the records: So I rsynced 2.4.23-pre5-ben0, compiled it monolithic
> without that CPU-frequency scaling option.
> I renamed vm
Hi,
to start I'm back in Sarge with my PBG4 12".
Finally it was Ben's hint which made the day a red-letter day.
For the records: So I rsynced 2.4.23-pre5-ben0, compiled it monolithic
without that CPU-frequency scaling option.
I renamed vmlinux to linux.bin. Then I went on as Matthias Schmidt
re
4 matches
Mail list logo