Hi,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:50:18PM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> Just realizing this. :)
>
> Does someone want to pick libffi up?
Interesting enough Brent Fulgham just made a libffi package when he was
hacking on sablevm another Java Virtual Machine.
(See mail at end.)
> On Fri, Jul 21
On Friday, July 21, 2000 2:50 PM, Ean R . Schuessler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Just realizing this. :)
>
> Does someone want to pick libffi up?
I am the libffi author and would happy to answer questions should they arise.
AG
Just realizing this. :)
Does someone want to pick libffi up?
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 10:12:29PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Friday 21 July 2000, at 12 h 6, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On this note I guess that the most sensible thing to do
On Friday 21 July 2000, at 12 h 6, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On this note I guess that the most sensible thing to do is go ahead and
> put the CVS .debs I have in incoming.
Do you plan to compile them with --with-libffi? At least on PowerPC, this is
mand
Oh. Whoops. Thats what I meant.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 10:29:47AM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
>
> > On this note I guess that the most sensible thing to do is go ahead and
> > put the CVS .debs I have in incoming.
> >
> > I'm thinking that I'll n
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> On this note I guess that the most sensible thing to do is go ahead and
> put the CVS .debs I have in incoming.
>
> I'm thinking that I'll name them 1.0.5.[cvs date DDMMYY]. Versioning should
> work ok that way and I could even do daily CVS posts
On this note I guess that the most sensible thing to do is go ahead and
put the CVS .debs I have in incoming.
I'm thinking that I'll name them 1.0.5.[cvs date DDMMYY]. Versioning should
work ok that way and I could even do daily CVS posts.
Thoughts?
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:29:53PM +0200, St
7 matches
Mail list logo
