Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Theoretically (and practically also), an EOF should *never* be compared
> to a char: only to an int.
>
>> --- open21xx-0.7.5.orig/as21/cpp.c
>> +++ open21xx-0.7.5/as21/cpp.c
>> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
>> /* - 2 to leave room for testing comments and
Sorry for the comment, but I may be missing something obvious here:
On Aug 13 2007, Matej Vela wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Given the list of failing architectures, I think the most likely
> > cause is some code relying on char being signed by default. And
> > indeed, bui
4:37 AM
To: Michel Dänzer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Paul Wise; Keith Clifford; debian-powerpc;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#376159: Open21xx Bug Report
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:55 +, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Looks like
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:36 +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:55 +, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> Looks like it never built/worked on those platforms:
> >>
> >> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=open21xx
> >>
> >> Hopefully
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 15:55 +, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Looks like it never built/worked on those platforms:
>>
>> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=open21xx
>>
>> Hopefully someone on the porter lists will be able to help (CCed).
>>
>> If n
5 matches
Mail list logo