Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Well, as opposed to -powerpc-smp. They come from the name of the two > > config i build (powerpc and powerpc-smp), but also is a limitation of > > kernel-package, who c

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-21 Thread Guido Guenther
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 04:03:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > The pmac/chrp/chrp-rs6k/prep variants are not different configuration > files, but different image formats built from the same configuration. In > fact they share the same modules (kernel-modules-2.4.22-powerpc and > -powerpc-smp) as we

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-21 Thread Guido Guenther
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Well, as opposed to -powerpc-smp. They come from the name of the two > config i build (powerpc and powerpc-smp), but also is a limitation of > kernel-package, who cannot dissociate the version of the kernel from the > name of the result

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-21 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:43:57AM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote: > Hi Sven, > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:03:37PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Install the kernel-image-2.4.22-powerpc-chrp-rs6k package, and you > > should get the zImage.chrp-rs6k which is called > > /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-powerpc. > is

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-21 Thread Guido Guenther
Hi Sven, On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:03:37PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Install the kernel-image-2.4.22-powerpc-chrp-rs6k package, and you > should get the zImage.chrp-rs6k which is called > /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-powerpc. is there a special reason why you encode the -powerpc- in all of the subarchit

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Rolf Brudeseth wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote: > Why is the zImage called vmlinuz (see above). Surely this must confuse more > people than just me. Above you say you provide it and below you do not. Tradition. Originally the UNIX ker

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:15:09PM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sven, > > > > > > I would like to test the chrp-rs6k image and use it in conjunction with > > > di; > > > however, I need zI

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-20 Thread Rolf Brudeseth
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sven, > > > > I would like to test the chrp-rs6k image and use it in conjunction with > di; > > however, I need zImage (or zImage.inetd) for network install, and the > > vmlinux image. > > > > It is not clear

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote: > > > > > Sven, > > I would like to test the chrp-rs6k image and use it in conjunction with di; > however, I need zImage (or zImage.inetd) for network install, and the > vmlinux image. > > It is not clear to me what these .deb an

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-20 Thread Rolf Brudeseth
.fr> cc: 10/14/2003 12:29 Subject: Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-14 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:36:04AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > Could someone review this patch? I tested the build image yesterday, > and one of the problems it ran into was not finding /usr/bin/ppcdetect. > I remembered archdetect had replaced ppcdetect, this looks like what > is needed to comp

Re: Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:36:04AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > Could someone review this patch? I tested the build image yesterday, > and one of the problems it ran into was not finding /usr/bin/ppcdetect. > I remembered archdetect had replaced ppcdetect, this looks like what > is needed to comp

Proposed patch: ppcdetect -> archdetect

2003-10-14 Thread Chris Tillman
Could someone review this patch? I tested the build image yesterday, and one of the problems it ran into was not finding /usr/bin/ppcdetect. I remembered archdetect had replaced ppcdetect, this looks like what is needed to complete the transition for powerpc. Index: tools/base-installer/debian/ch