powerpc port maintainers

2014-04-09 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi, When the roll call for port maintainers came up a few months down, I put my name down as a part-time powerpc person. However, I've had to recuse myself for various reasons--I won't be able to commit to doing any powerpc porting or port-related work for jessie. If anyone else can

any objections from port maintainers to make gcc-4.4 the default?

2009-09-20 Thread Matthias Klose
Besides the open license issue, are there any objections from port maintainers to make GCC-4.4 the default? As a first step that would be a change of the default for C, C++, ObjC, ObjC++ and Fortran. I'm not sure about Java, which show some regressions compared to 4.3. Otoh it's n

Re: Port maintainers.

2008-07-19 Thread Rogério Brito
On Jul 20 2008, Wartan Hachaturow wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, filling the informations in the linked page surely helps. It is > > though a bit hard to gather these informations - the requalification > > page from last year didn't co

Re: Port maintainers.

2008-07-19 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a link to the information page at the top. Ah, I see. > Well, filling the informations in the linked page surely helps. It is > though a bit hard to gather these informations - the requalification > page from

Re: Port maintainers.

2008-07-19 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Wartan Hachaturow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-19 22:17:15 CEST]: > Checking the arch requalification wiki page, I've noticed that powerpc > port is "at risk", partly because of just 2 maintainers mentioned. > Is that true, and if it is, who are those two brave guys? ;) There is a link to the i

Port maintainers.

2008-07-19 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
Hello. Checking the arch requalification wiki page, I've noticed that powerpc port is "at risk", partly because of just 2 maintainers mentioned. Is that true, and if it is, who are those two brave guys? ;) As I use the port extensively, I'd surely like to help. Is there a TODO list anywhere? --

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-30 Thread Roger Leigh
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >>> Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc >>> issues. >> >> While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time >> permits, I can't take any

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Michael Schmitz
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:28AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > > > > > Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc > > > issues. > > > > While I do work on powerpc issue

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If all you do is make sure the right people are aware of the problem > so there is a high chance in getting things fixed, you would qualify > as port maintainer IMHO... I agree on that and can help with the need uploads and like, if needed. -- O T

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Luk Claes
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc issues. While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time permits, I can't take any kind of leading role at this time, and I'd prefer the p

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Luk Claes
I really should be added as port maintainer. In the Etch page it was called Developers and I got lured into adding myself under the impression that it was about DDs, not about port maintainers. I don't feel I got the required insight into the architecture to be called that, sorry. A port

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
nd I got lured into adding myself under the impression that it was about DDs, not about port maintainers. I don't feel I got the required insight into the architecture to be called that, sorry. So long, and sorry. Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:28AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > > > Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc > > issues. > > While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time > permits, I can't ta

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc > issues. While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time permits, I can't take any kind of leading role at this time, and I'd prefer the people who are 'ru

No port maintainers?

2007-10-26 Thread Luk Claes
Hi Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc issues. Feel free to complete the page for the other criteria as well... Cheers Luk [0] http://wiki.debian.org/powerpcLennyReleaseRecertification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe