Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-26 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:45:42PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote: > I gave it a whirl. I used the same procedure as described in my previous > report. > > The differences I noticed were: > > When it got to partitioning I chose (as last time) “guided — use whole disk”. > It produced a partitioning th

Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-26 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/26/2017 11:10 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: If you think it would be helpful, I can do it again but leave the partitioning alone — not create an ext2 /boot partition. This would verify (or falsify) Frank’s observation that yaboot requires ext2. Yes, can you please test this? Apparently, the /

Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-26 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 26, 2017, at 12:07 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 09/26/2017 07:45 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > >> One other oddity I noticed was that the HFS partition was not labeled >> “bootstrap” as it has always been in the past. >> The name does not appear to be necessary, but loosing it

Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-26 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/26/2017 09:07 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > When was that machine installed? > > In this context, I just found this commit [2] which added the /boot > partition. Note the > additional "$defaultignore{}" designation which apparently means the > partition is not > created in all cas

Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-26 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/26/2017 07:45 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > When it got to partitioning I chose (as last time) “guided — use whole disk”. > It produced a partitioning that had a 1MB HFS partition marked as bootable, > but no ext2 partition for /boot. > Based on Frank’s experience that yaboot couldn’t handle ext4

Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-25 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 25, 2017, at 1:02 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 09/25/2017 10:26 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> However the partitioning scheme used by “guided — use whole disk" doesn't >>> produce an HFS+ "bootstrap" partition or an ext2 "/boot" partition. >>> I created the two m

Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/25/2017 10:26 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> However the partitioning scheme used by “guided — use whole disk" doesn't >> produce an HFS+ "bootstrap" partition or an ext2 "/boot" partition. >> I created the two missing partitions manually, and let it proceed to the >> “pick a repo

Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-25 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 25, 2017, at 1:26 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I used an earlier CD which went into rescue mode OK. > > Hmm. Ok. Do you know when this CD was generated? Sure… The one that worked was the previous CD from you. Rick

Re: New ppc64 installer image available -- installation test report

2017-09-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Rick! Thanks for your detailed feedback, this is very appreciated. On 09/25/2017 09:08 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: The partitioner no longer complains about not knowing which partitioning scheme to use, which is good news. As I expected and also verified with my POWER7 VM. However the partit