El jue, 27-07-2006 a las 22:58 +0200, Matthias Grimm escribió:
> Have you heard of any problems with i2c and kernel 2.6.16-2?
> Which kernel version did you use in the past as i2c worked?
No...
>
> > Do you want I find the old kernel and I try with it?
>
> If this is not a burden for you, it wo
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 12:04:34PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> cpu : 7447A, altivec supported
> clock : 833.333000MHz
> revision : 0.2 (pvr 8003 0102)
> bogomips : 36.73
> timebase : 18432000
> platform : PowerM
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 the mental interface of
julio told:
> El vie, 21-07-2006 a las 17:13 +0200, Matthias Grimm escribió:
> > It would be very kind if someone with a PowerBook5,1 to PowerBook5,7
> > could run the test program and send me the output. The machine
> > identification seems to work good
El dom, 23-07-2006 a las 19:54 +0200, julio escribió:
> $ uname -a
> Linux malastrana 2.6.15-1-powerpc #2 Mon Mar 6 12:39:17 CET 2006 ppc
> GNU/Linux
Sorry, but the right kernel is
$ uname -a
Linux malastrana 2.6.16-2-powerpc #1 Sat Jul 15 17:39:41 CEST 2006 ppc
GNU/Linux
El vie, 21-07-2006 a las 17:13 +0200, Matthias Grimm escribió:
> It would be very kind if someone with a PowerBook5,1 to PowerBook5,7
> could run the test program and send me the output. The machine
> identification seems to work good, but primarily I wanted to test the
> LMU detection.
>
>
$ ca
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:22:11 +0200
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 17:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > I2C: 'i2c-7', 'uni-n 0' probing /dev/i2c-7 ... gotcha, this is the
> > LMU device I2C: 'i2c-6', 'mac-io 0'
>
> Btw, this makes it seem that you don't under
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 17:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I2C: 'i2c-7', 'uni-n 0' probing /dev/i2c-7 ... gotcha, this is the
> LMU device I2C: 'i2c-6', 'mac-io 0'
Btw, this makes it seem that you don't understand how the i2c devices
work; /dev/i2c-7 isn't the LMU device, /dev/i2c-7 is the devi
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 the mental interface of
Matthias Grimm told:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:19:30 +0200
> Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would be very kind if someone with a PowerBook5,1 to PowerBook5,7
[...]
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 7447A, altive
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 17:13 +0200, Matthias Grimm wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:19:30 +0200
> Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would be very kind if someone with a PowerBook5,1 to PowerBook5,7
> could run the test program and send me the output. The machine
> identification seems
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:19:30 +0200
Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be very kind if someone with a PowerBook5,1 to PowerBook5,7
could run the test program and send me the output. The machine
identification seems to work good, but primarily I wanted to test the
LMU detection.
B
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> debian:/home/brian/Downloads# ./of_probing
>
> Probing machine...
>Machine: ID = 3 -> PowerBook Wallstreet (Apr 1998)
>OF: '/proc/device-tree/reg'
> Path incomplete! One or more elements not found.
>LMU
debian:/home/brian/Downloads# ./of_probing Probing machine... Machine: ID = 3 -> PowerBook Wallstreet (Apr 1998) OF: '/proc/device-tree/reg' Path incomplete! One or more elements not found. LMU: No LMU found! --- debian:/home/brian/Downloads# cat /proc/cpuinfo proces
El jue, 20-07-2006 a las 21:29 -0300, Juan A. Diaz escribió:
> El mié, 19-07-2006 a las 19:35 +0200, Matthias Grimm escribió:
> > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:19:30 +0200
> > Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Damn, I didn't removed my debugging stuff and so the program used a
> > wrong d
El mié, 19-07-2006 a las 19:35 +0200, Matthias Grimm escribió:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:19:30 +0200
> Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Damn, I didn't removed my debugging stuff and so the program used a
> wrong device tree path. Sorry for that. Replace line
>
>#define OFBASE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ofp]$ strings /proc/device-tree/model
PowerBook6,7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ofp]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 7447A, altivec supported
clock : 1333.333000MHz
revision: 0.2 (pvr 8003 0102)
bogomips: 73.47
timebase: 18432000
pla
Hallo Matthias,
Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:19:30 +0200
> Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Damn, I didn't removed my debugging stuff and so the program used a
> wrong device tree path. Sorry for that. Replace line
% ./of_test
Probing machine...
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:19:30 +0200
Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Damn, I didn't removed my debugging stuff and so the program used a
wrong device tree path. Sorry for that. Replace line
#define OFBASE "./device-tree"
with line
#define OFBASE "/proc/device-tree"
The at
Hallo Matthias,
Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:45:57 +0200
> Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for your support so far. I put the new knowledge into a
> revised program and attached it again. Changes are:
>
> I hope you give it another t
El lun, 17-07-2006 a las 21:19 +0200, Matthias Grimm escribió:
> I hope you give it another try :-)
$ cat /etc/debian_version
testing/unstable
$ uname -a
Linux malastrana 2.6.15-1-powerpc #2 Mon Mar 6 12:39:17 CET 2006 ppc
GNU/Linux
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 7447/
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:45:57 +0200
Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks a lot for your support so far. I put the new knowledge into a
revised program and attached it again. Changes are:
- There are two known locations for the lmu-controller in the
device-tree so far. Both are suppor
El dom, 16-07-2006 a las 15:45 +0200, Matthias Grimm escribió:
> I would appreciate any feedback.
$ cat /etc/debian_version
testing/unstable
$ uname -a
Linux malastrana 2.6.15-1-powerpc #2 Mon Mar 6 12:39:17 CET 2006 ppc
GNU/Linux
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 7447/74
Hello Matthias,
Matthias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I want to use some OF and kernel 2.6 features to improve device probing
> in pbbuttonsd. Unfortunately I have only an ancient PowerBook so I need
> your help to test the new routines on as many different machines as
> possible.
>
> 2. detecting the LMU I2C address
>The program looked for the "lmu-controller" in the device tree and
>read the attached data to find out the I2C address.
>This test will only have a result, if you have a PowerBook with an
>ambient light sensor. Otherwise the program won't find an
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 03:45:57PM +0200, Matthias Grimm wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I want to use some OF and kernel 2.6 features to improve device probing
> in pbbuttonsd. Unfortunately I have only an ancient PowerBook so I need
> your help to test the new routines on as many different machines as
> possib
Hi,
I want to use some OF and kernel 2.6 features to improve device probing
in pbbuttonsd. Unfortunately I have only an ancient PowerBook so I need
your help to test the new routines on as many different machines as
possible.
I attached the source code of a short program. You could compile it as
25 matches
Mail list logo
