Re: Mail-Followup-To (was Re: New with PPC soon...)

2001-08-21 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I'll let Branden take this one. > > Unfortunately (?), it is all too easy to rebut. The author of the above > referenced message, which says that both Mail-Followup-To and > Mail-Copies-To should be totally ignored, is "Jamie Zawinski <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>". > > That should be a strong enough

Re: Mail-Followup-To (was Re: New with PPC soon...)

2001-08-21 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:06:06AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:55:32AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > Apparently Mail-Followup-To isn't a standard header... > > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution-hackers/2001-February/002104.html > > > > And it mea

Mail-Followup-To (was Re: New with PPC soon...)

2001-08-21 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:55:32AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Apparently Mail-Followup-To isn't a standard header... > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution-hackers/2001-February/002104.html > > And it means different things for different mailers (if at all). Doesn't > make m