On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:54:05AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> Then I don't understand anymore how you manage to get
> undefined reference to `elf32_getehdr'
> and so on. Must be some other trick.
i found the problem, the following patch fixed it:
--- Rules.make~ Wed Aug 23 23:29:53 200
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:42:59PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> > Do you have libelf installed? In the bk version of mol, I see
> > STATIC_LIBS = /usr/lib/libelf.a
> > in booter/Makefile.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] eb]$ locate libelf.a
> /usr/lib/libelf.a
> [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:42:59PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Do you have libelf installed? In the bk version of mol, I see
> STATIC_LIBS = /usr/lib/libelf.a
> in booter/Makefile.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eb]$ locate libelf.a
/usr/lib/libelf.a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eb]$ dlocate -S /usr/lib/libelf.a
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 05:11:07AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> (i don't see anything in the archives on this so..)
>
> has anyone tried compiling MOL lately? with version 0.9.50 (after
> adding libiberty.h from binutils-dev source to mol-/include/) i get
> this:
drow:~% apt-cache show libel
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> (i don't see anything in the archives on this so..)
>
> has anyone tried compiling MOL lately? with version 0.9.50 (after
> adding libiberty.h from binutils-dev source to mol-/include/) i get
> this:
>
> gcc -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXext -lncurses -lpthread -lm -o mol
(i don't see anything in the archives on this so..)
has anyone tried compiling MOL lately? with version 0.9.50 (after
adding libiberty.h from binutils-dev source to mol-/include/) i get
this:
gcc -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXext -lncurses -lpthread -lm -o mol
debugger/debugger.o emulation/emulat
6 matches
Mail list logo
