On Mar 12 2005, Mauro wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-02 at 14:08 -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > I am under the impression that journalling in HFS+ was implemented the
> > same way ext3 was implemented over ext2, because if I mount the HFS+
> > Journalled filesystem on a Linux system, Linux shows two hid
On Sat, 2005-12-02 at 14:08 -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> I am under the impression that journalling in HFS+ was implemented the
> same
> way ext3 was implemented over ext2, because if I mount the HFS+
> Journalled
> filesystem on a Linux system, Linux shows two hidden files that I can
> delete.
I
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:53:18PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Feb 11 2005, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > I strongly disagree. Debian's kernels are good one-size-fits-all
> > kernels, but they definitely lack in efficiency and perfomance speed.
>
> I would like to know in which aspects the s
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 02:08:48PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> I am under the impression that journalling in HFS+ was implemented the same
> way ext3 was implemented over ext2, because if I mount the HFS+ Journalled
> filesystem on a Linux system, Linux shows two hidden files that I can
> delete.
On Feb 11 2005, William R Sowerbutts wrote:
> That's clever. I'll have to give it a go one day. Does it support
> journalled HFS+? The Mac Mini ships with a single journalled HFS+
> partition spanning the entire disk. I'm not sure how journalling was
> implemented in HFS+, presumably it's backward
On Feb 11 2005, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I strongly disagree. Debian's kernels are good one-size-fits-all
> kernels, but they definitely lack in efficiency and perfomance speed.
I would like to know in which aspects the speed of the system would be
*appreciatively* different.
I've been using
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Djoume SALVETTI wrote:
> Le vendredi 02/11/05 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > 2) you say "Build an optimized kernel". I strongly object to this
> > recomendation, and ask you to remove it from your howto. The existing
> > debian
> > ker
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:42:59PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > 2) you say "Build an optimized kernel". I strongly object to this
> > recomendation, and ask you to remove it from your howto. The existing
> > debian
> > kernel should be eno
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:08:47PM +0100, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> Ciao Sven Luther, nel tuo messaggio dicevi:
>
> > The existing debian
> > kernel should be enough for everyone, and i don't believe that you can
> > further optimize it.
>
> I guess the fastest way is to try it by myself, anyw
Le vendredi 02/11/05 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> 2) you say "Build an optimized kernel". I strongly object to this
> recomendation, and ask you to remove it from your howto. The existing debian
> kernel should be enough for everyone, and i don't believe that you can
> furthe
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:42:59PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > 2) you say "Build an optimized kernel". I strongly object to this
> > recomendation, and ask you to remove it from your howto. The existing
> > debian
> > kernel should be eno
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 05:26:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Please make sure to fill a bug report against parted about this.
done :)
--
Victor Sanahuja (ViCToRy) - Registered Linux User #198934 - http://piscue.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:31:25PM +0100, ViCToRy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:10:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > 1) debian-installer provided libparted based partman partitioner
> > > > should be
> > > > able to resize HFS and HFS+ partititons, i have not personally played
> > >
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:10:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 1) debian-installer provided libparted based partman partitioner should
> > > be
> > > able to resize HFS and HFS+ partititons, i have not personally played
> > > much
> > > with it, but it should work. Feedback is welcome.
> >
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> 2) you say "Build an optimized kernel". I strongly object to this
> recomendation, and ask you to remove it from your howto. The existing debian
> kernel should be enough for everyone, and i don't believe that you can
> further optimize it.
I stro
Ciao Sven Luther, nel tuo messaggio dicevi:
> The existing debian
> kernel should be enough for everyone, and i don't believe that you can
> further optimize it.
I guess the fastest way is to try it by myself, anyway: now debian kernels
support iBooks?
I mean, there is no need to recompile it
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:43:46AM +, William R Sowerbutts wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:18:08PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 1) debian-installer provided libparted based partman partitioner should be
> > able to resize HFS and HFS+ partititons, i have not personally play
Hi Sven,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:18:08PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> 1) debian-installer provided libparted based partman partitioner should be
> able to resize HFS and HFS+ partititons, i have not personally played much
> with it, but it should work. Feedback is welcome.
That's clever. I'l
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:12:15AM +, William R Sowerbutts wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've updated my "Linux on the Mac Mini" article.
>
> http://sowerbutts.com/linux-mac-mini/
>
> Most of the updates are towards the end.
>
> The article now contains a guide which will help you to convert a tim
Hi all,
I've updated my "Linux on the Mac Mini" article.
http://sowerbutts.com/linux-mac-mini/
Most of the updates are towards the end.
The article now contains a guide which will help you to convert a timid, fresh
out of the box Mac Mini system into a raging, dual boot Debian/Mac OS X
system
20 matches
Mail list logo
