begin Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 05:15, Steve Lauziere wrote:
>> [...] compiling radeonfb as a module [...] should fix the problem.
>
> It's usually better to build the DRM as a module instead because
> radeonfb is useful on boot.
But why is it a problem to c
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 05:15, Steve Lauziere wrote:
> [...] compiling radeonfb as a module [...] should fix the problem.
It's usually better to build the DRM as a module instead because
radeonfb is useful on boot.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre
Steve Lauziere a écrit :
No, you didn't do anything wrong. Either syncing with the latest benh
kernel (i think it is fixed in the latest), compiling radeonfb as a
module, or fixing it yourself should fix the problem.
-steve
Joerg Sommer wrote:
Hi,
since some versions, I can't remeber ex
No, you didn't do anything wrong. Either syncing with the latest benh
kernel (i think it is fixed in the latest), compiling radeonfb as a
module, or fixing it yourself should fix the problem.
-steve
Joerg Sommer wrote:
Hi,
since some versions, I can't remeber exctly when, I can't compile t
Hi,
since some versions, I can't remeber exctly when, I can't compile the
kernel (actuell 2.6.2-ben1) with drm for radeon and the new radeon fb
compiled in.
CONFIG_DRM=y
CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=y
# CONFIG_FB_RADEON_OLD is not set
CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y
#v+
LD drivers/built-in.o
drivers/video/built-
5 matches
Mail list logo