On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 08:32:54PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> If you are using double precision floating point, the speed of a
> program compiled 32bit on a 64bit machine is much much slower (maybe
> 1/10). The 64bit kernel supports 64bit operation Only if the program
> is compile 64 bit ! Moreo
On 10/5/10, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote:
>
> Are you a Gentoo user? ;^P
>
No because I do not have the steady internet needed and besides I
would wish to do custom build as a group. But I know what you mean
Gentoo lets you auto build everything yourself from scratch.
Its a pain besides that's why I pref
On 10/5/10, Gary Driggs wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:59 AM, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
>
>> I don't see how this is the reason for /bin/ls being compiled in 64-bit.
>
> True but Apache, MySQL, OpenOffice.org or LibreOffice, icecat & other
> browsers, as well as several other apps would benefit from
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:59 AM, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> I don't see how this is the reason for /bin/ls being compiled in 64-bit.
True but Apache, MySQL, OpenOffice.org or LibreOffice, icecat & other browsers,
as well as several other apps would benefit from having a smaller, optional
repo for 64
On Tuesday, October 5, 2010, Brian Morris wrote:
> If you are using double precision floating point, the speed of a
> program compiled 32bit on a 64bit machine is much much slower (maybe
> 1/10). The 64bit kernel supports 64bit operation Only if the program
> is compile 64 bit ! Moreover with any
Le 5 oct. 10 à 05:32, Brian Morris a écrit :
On 10/4/10, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
The same reasoning as before applies -- why would you want to do
this?
What are the benefits compared to multiarch ppc32/ppc64?
If you are using double precision floating point, the speed of a
program comp
On 10/4/10, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
>
>
> The same reasoning as before applies -- why would you want to do this?
> What are the benefits compared to multiarch ppc32/ppc64?
>
If you are using double precision floating point, the speed of a
program compiled 32bit on a 64bit machine is much much slo
2010/10/2 Hiroyuki Yamamoto :
> I am planning to restart the ppc64 porting project using the debian-ports
> project in the near future.
> I want the ppc64 port to be joined to the official by the time debian will be
> released.
>
> How about this plan?
The same reasoning as before applies -- wh
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:12:00PM +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I am planning to restart the ppc64 porting project using the debian-ports
> project in the near future.
> I want the ppc64 port to be joined to the official by the time debian will be
> released.
>
> How about this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I am planning to restart the ppc64 porting project using the debian-ports
project in the near future.
I want the ppc64 port to be joined to the official by the time debian will be
released.
How about this plan?
Regards,
- --
Hiroyuki Yamamot
10 matches
Mail list logo
