At 15:40 +0100 29 Dec 2001, Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what it looked like from the gdb trace. I'll keep your patch
> solution around - even where __va_copy is defined for other archs it
> should not hurt to use it and work on a copy of va_list, right?
Since archs that don
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 03:40:31PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
> > > obvious fix (make sure the built-in CRASHES_ON_STARTUP workaround is
> > > defined :)), but Mark Brown says that doesn't help. The only unstable
> >
>
> > Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
> > obvious fix (make sure the built-in CRASHES_ON_STARTUP workaround is
> > defined :)), but Mark Brown says that doesn't help. The only unstable
>
> Another occurrence of reusing a va_list variable. Although in this
> cas
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 04:03:52AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> Another occurrence of reusing a va_list variable. Although in this
> case, it looks like it was just an oversight. In addition to fixing
That worked. I'm uploading just now.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a da
> Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
Looking at the bug report:
A backtrace of the crash:
#0 0x0fb24568 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x0faf52ac in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x0fb0f890 in vsprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0x0ff9a754 in vspr
At 18:16 -0600 28 Dec 2001, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
> obvious fix (make sure the built-in CRASHES_ON_STARTUP workaround is
> defined :)), but Mark Brown says that doesn't help. The only unstable
Another occurr
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:42PM -0600, Taral wrote:
> I'll see if I can get a hold of my friend's debian/ppc box and look into
> this.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/X11/cooledit
[New Thread 1024 (LWP 19837)]
cooledit:stringtools.c:537: vsprintf wrote out of bounds
Program received sign
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 06:16:51PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
> obvious fix (make sure the built-in CRASHES_ON_STARTUP workaround is
> defined :)), but Mark Brown says that doesn't help. The only unstable
> powerpc machine I c
Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
obvious fix (make sure the built-in CRASHES_ON_STARTUP workaround is
defined :)), but Mark Brown says that doesn't help. The only unstable
powerpc machine I can access is voltaire, and since that doesn't seem to
accept ssh X for
9 matches
Mail list logo
