Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> > For those interested, http://gftp.seul.org/ , no powerpc.deb yet, and no
> > source either.
>
> There is source:
>
>
> gftp-2.0.7a.tar.gz - Source
> gftp-2.0.7a-1.src.rpm - Source RPM
> gftp-2.0.7a-1.i386.rpm - Binary i386 RPM
> gftp_2.0.7a_i3
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 10:40:19AM +0200, Hadess wanted to say the following:
> Wahoo,
>
> Didn't know that so many people would jump in this thread, hehe. Thank you
> all
> for your tips, I just found that gFTP (which is quite buggy, though) supports
> SSH (much the same way sftp does, i think
Wahoo,
Didn't know that so many people would jump in this thread, hehe. Thank you all
for your tips, I just found that gFTP (which is quite buggy, though) supports
SSH (much the same way sftp does, i think).
For those interested, http://gftp.seul.org/ , no powerpc.deb yet, and no source
either.
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:48:09PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Quoting Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > > I like sftp - the source should be in woody.
> > > >
> > > > If only it had
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:48:09PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Quoting Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > I like sftp - the source should be in woody.
> > >
> > > If only it had some of the more advanced features of ncftp or lftp..
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I like sftp - the source should be in woody.
> >
> > If only it had some of the more advanced features of ncftp or lftp...
>
> Hum, should do the job, anything can be better than scp anyway (I don't t
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:43:16PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:23:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I've compiled everything in Helix Code and Evolution, but still 2
> > packages won't
> > > be included:
>
Quoting Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I like sftp - the source should be in woody.
>
> If only it had some of the more advanced features of ncftp or lftp...
Hum, should do the job, anything can be better than scp anyway (I don't think
that any sane people have been using that).
Thank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> > > I would need a pointer to an "ftp over ssh" program, or any good program
> > > to easily upload this stuff to sourceforge.net as it doesn't have a
> > > normal ftp...
> >
> > scp? (man scp)
>
> I know scp (heh). I meant something more like an ncftp or something
Quoting Tuomas Kuosmanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:23:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wanted to
> say the following:
>
> > I would need a pointer to an "ftp over ssh" program, or any good
> program to
> > easily upload this stuff to sourceforge.net as it doesn't have a
> nor
Quoting Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:23:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've compiled everything in Helix Code and Evolution, but still 2
> packages won't
> > be included:
>
> > - gtk-themes, because of the Stone engine being already compiled for
> x8
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:23:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've compiled everything in Helix Code and Evolution, but still 2 packages
> won't
> be included:
> - gtk-themes, because of the Stone engine being already compiled for x86 in
> the
> source package.
Sigh, I thought I had fi
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:23:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wanted to say the
following:
> I would need a pointer to an "ftp over ssh" program, or any good program to
> easily upload this stuff to sourceforge.net as it doesn't have a normal ftp...
scp? (man scp)
Tuomas
--
.---> [EMAIL PROT
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:23:22AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Second report,
>
> I've compiled everything in Helix Code and Evolution, but still 2 packages
> won't
> be included:
> - gtk-themes, because of the Stone engine being already compiled for x86 in
> the
> source
Hi again,
Second report,
I've compiled everything in Helix Code and Evolution, but still 2 packages
won't
be included:
- gtk-themes, because of the Stone engine being already compiled for x86 in the
source package.
- Abiword, I really couldn't get it to compile.
- gnumeric and gnome-iconedit u
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 02:26:02PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Also i guess there are some package in helix that are not yet in
> > debian/woody,
> > am i right in thinking this ? and if yes, what are they ?
> Well, I couldn't find any of the updated .deb you're talking about... Please
Quoting Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:18:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi fellow PPC users,
> >
> > Here I make a report of the status of the .debs I compiled over the
> > week-end and will (very soon) make available. I CC'ed Peter
> > Teichman, as he
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:18:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi fellow PPC users,
>
> Here I make a report of the status of the .debs I compiled over the
> week-end and will (very soon) make available. I CC'ed Peter
> Teichman, as he seems to be the current maintainer for the Debian
> pack
Quoting Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:52:12PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Quoting Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >
> > > Just a question, ...
> > >
> > > what is the true benefit from running helix gnome in place of
> official
> > > debian
> > > g
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:52:12PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > Just a question, ...
> >
> > what is the true benefit from running helix gnome in place of official
> > debian
> > gnome packages ?
>
> Hum... They're up-to-date ! If you know
Quoting Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just a question, ...
>
> what is the true benefit from running helix gnome in place of official
> debian
> gnome packages ?
Hum... They're up-to-date ! If you know where I can get the official debian
packages for these updated packages (I looked in
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:18:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi fellow PPC users,
>
> Here I make a report of the status of the .debs I compiled over the week-end
> and
> will (very soon) make available. I CC'ed Peter Teichman, as he seems to be the
> current maintainer for the Debian pac
Hi fellow PPC users,
Here I make a report of the status of the .debs I compiled over the week-end and
will (very soon) make available. I CC'ed Peter Teichman, as he seems to be the
current maintainer for the Debian packages. I recompiled most of Helix GNOME for
Debian/PPC.
First the 2 packages th
23 matches
Mail list logo
