On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:53:18PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Feb 11 2005, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > I strongly disagree. Debian's kernels are good one-size-fits-all
> > kernels, but they definitely lack in efficiency and perfomance speed.
>
> I would like to know in which aspects the s
On Feb 11 2005, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I strongly disagree. Debian's kernels are good one-size-fits-all
> kernels, but they definitely lack in efficiency and perfomance speed.
I would like to know in which aspects the speed of the system would be
*appreciatively* different.
I've been using
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:42:59PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > 2) you say "Build an optimized kernel". I strongly object to this
> > recomendation, and ask you to remove it from your howto. The existing
> > debian
> > kernel should be eno
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:42:59PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > 2) you say "Build an optimized kernel". I strongly object to this
> > recomendation, and ask you to remove it from your howto. The existing
> > debian
> > kernel should be eno
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> 2) you say "Build an optimized kernel". I strongly object to this
> recomendation, and ask you to remove it from your howto. The existing debian
> kernel should be enough for everyone, and i don't believe that you can
> further optimize it.
I stro
5 matches
Mail list logo
