Re: Bug#821179: mpi-defaults: Please add powerpcspe architecture support

2016-04-20 Thread kaleb white
OK. Easy-peasy. Sent from MSN From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Sent: April 16, 2016 7:52:42 AM To: Mattia Rizzolo Cc: 821...@bugs.debian.org; debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#821179: mpi-defaults: Please add powerpcspe architecture support

Re: Bug#821179: mpi-defaults: Please add powerpcspe architecture support

2016-04-16 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 04/16/2016 04:33 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> We could still revist this in the future. > > Not really. > Changing the default (as we did in s390x recently) implies a painful > transition where you have to rebuild everything in the correct order (or > they just ftbfs). Ok, I wasn't aware of th

Re: Bug#821179: mpi-defaults: Please add powerpcspe architecture support

2016-04-16 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 04:23:46PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 04/16/2016 01:43 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I can very easily add it, though, do you confirm that you want > > mpi-defaults to use openmpi on the powerpcspe architecture? > > Since Matthias set openmpi as the defaul

Re: Bug#821179: mpi-defaults: Please add powerpcspe architecture support

2016-04-16 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 04/16/2016 01:43 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I can very easily add it, though, do you confirm that you want > mpi-defaults to use openmpi on the powerpcspe architecture? Since Matthias set openmpi as the default for powerpcspe in 1.0.2+nmu2, I think it's safe to stay with that option for the ti

Re: Bug#821179: mpi-defaults: Please add powerpcspe architecture support

2016-04-16 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
user debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org usertags 821179 powerpcspe thanks (re-adding the usertag as there was a blank line in the first message, so debbugs have ignored them) On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:56:07PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Since mpi-defaults is a reverse depndency of boo