Hi,
This is off topic here, but we're normally forgiving about that fact
On 28 Aug, this message from Mehul Sanghvi echoed through cyberspace:
> I've got a problem with Apache-1.3 and virtual domains which, at least
> to me, does
> not seem to make sense. I've
I've got a problem with Apache-1.3 and virtual domains which, at least
to me, does
not seem to make sense. I've had this sort of a setup before and
everything worked
with no problem.
According to the documentation examples, I should be able to do the following:
### Begin setup
NameV
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:23:52PM +0100, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Must be a different issue, then! I am using sessions with the following
> PHP and Apache versions from sid on powerpc without problem (when
> sessions are handled in memory):
>
> ||/ Name Version
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:27, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
> I already have this setting changed to mm, and it makes no difference.
Must be a different issue, then! I am using sessions with the following
PHP and Apache versions from sid on powerpc without problem (when
sessions are handled
nged to mm, and it makes no difference.
However, if I downgrade to the woody version of apache, all works
perfectly... Strange...
Thanks for the reply!
Matthew,
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 03:50, Matthew Daubenspeck wrote:
> I am having a LOT of problems with the sarge/testing version of Apache
> when dealing with PHP Sessions. For the most part, anytime I load a
> PHP application that uses a PHP session, I have login/authentication
>
I am having a LOT of problems with the sarge/testing version of Apache
when dealing with PHP Sessions. For the most part, anytime I load a
PHP application that uses a PHP session, I have login/authentication
problems. In Mozilla, it gives a "This Document contains no data"
error, an
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 11:05:29AM -0700, Gilger.John wrote:
> Thus sproke Jack Howarth:
> Subject: Re: vulnerable to apache/ssl worm ?
>
> Vinai,
>No. From what I have read the code the worm executes is i386
> specific.
> Jack
>
> IIR
available.")
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 13:05, Gilger.John wrote:
> Thus sproke Jack Howarth:
> Subject: Re: vulnerable to apache/ssl worm ?
>
> Vinai,
>No. From what I have read the code the worm executes is i386
> specific.
> Jack
>
>
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 17:49, vinai wrote:
>
> Are we (on the PPC) vulnerable to the worm that's started making its
> rounds last week - the one that exploits an opening in the apache ssl
> module ? I thought I read somewhere that it might be x86 only, but I
> can't be a
Thus sproke Jack Howarth:
Subject: Re: vulnerable to apache/ssl worm ?
Vinai,
No. From what I have read the code the worm executes is i386
specific.
Jack
IIRC, the article on CNet said that it was *Intel* specific. That made me
wonder if it affects AMD chips also
Vinai,
No. From what I have read the code the worm executes is i386
specific.
Jack
Hi Folks,
Are we (on the PPC) vulnerable to the worm that's started making its
rounds last week - the one that exploits an opening in the apache ssl
module ? I thought I read somewhere that it might be x86 only, but I
can't be absolutely sure about that. But I do remember the artic
As I said, the error log is empty.
The /etc/init.d/apache basically starts up apache with apachectl.
Trying it at the command line does this:
##
linux:~# apachectl status
Looking up localhost
localhost
Making HTTP connection to localhost
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:10:53PM +0100, Joss Winn wrote:
>
> The only way I have found to get around it is reinstall the apache
> deb. But even this doesn't seem like a sure way to 'fix' it.
>
> Would appreciate some help!
You should try the "apachect
I've had problems with apache all along and really want to fix it.
I have the regular woody apache deb installed but it doesn't always
start on boot and when I try to start it at /etc/init.d/apache it
appears to be starting and then the process dies a couple of seconds
later.
no erro
> How did you get yours to work?
>
> -Lars
>
> 1) error message:
>
> # apt-get install apache
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Package apache has no available version, but exists in the database.
&g
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Lars D. Nood?n wrote:
> Thanks. Replacing 'stable' with 'testing' in sources.list allows me to
> install Apache.
>
> -Lars
>
eh, no problem. just passing on the little i know.
eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Thanks. Replacing 'stable' with 'testing' in sources.list allows me to
install Apache.
-Lars
On Tue, 14 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> > Yes, apt-get is trying to install potato.
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Lars D. Nood?n wrote:
> Yes, apt-get is trying to install potato. The man page for sources.list
> implies that I could just swap stable with woody. However, I've tried
> that without success. Should I point to different ftp mirrors?
>
> How did you get
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 05:40:17PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Lars D. Nood?n wrote:
> > Were can I find apache, apache-common and co.?
> > apt-get gives me the error below.
> >
> > -Lars
> >
> > --
>
stall apache
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package apache has no available version, but exists in the database.
This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and
never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not avai
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Lars D. Nood?n wrote:
> Were can I find apache, apache-common and co.?
> apt-get gives me the error below.
>
> -Lars
>
> --
> Lars Nood?n
> Lektor
> Institutt for dokumentasjonsvitenskap
> HUM-FAK, Universitetet i Tro
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 19:32, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> Were can I find apache, apache-common and co.?
> apt-get gives me the error below.
>
> -Lars
>
> --
> Lars Noodén
> Lektor
> Institutt for dokumentasjonsvitenskap
> HUM-FAK, Universitetet i Tromsø
>
Were can I find apache, apache-common and co.?
apt-get gives me the error below.
-Lars
--
Lars Noodén
Lektor
Institutt for dokumentasjonsvitenskap
HUM-FAK, Universitetet i Tromsø
Breivika, N-9037 Tromsoe, Norway
---
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Some packages could not
Hi,
I used apt-get to install Apache and Apache::DBI, but get errors when I
try to use it. For example, perl -e 'use Apache::DBI;' gives:
Can't locate object method "module" via package "Apache" (perhaps
you forgot to load "Apa
Quoting Damien GUIHAL ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'd like to know if anyone has build the ppc version of the libapache-mod-jk,
> which is tomcat plugger into apache, for servlet developpement. It appears
> that
> it exists only for ix86, is it too difficult to buils on other platfo
Damien GUIHAL wrote:
>
> I'd like to know if anyone has build the ppc version of the
> libapache-mod-jk, which is tomcat plugger into apache, for servlet
> developpement. It appears that it exists only for ix86, is it too difficult
> to buils on other platforms ?
It build
I'd like to know if anyone has build the ppc version of the libapache-mod-jk,
which is tomcat plugger into apache, for servlet developpement. It appears that
it exists only for ix86, is it too difficult to buils on other platforms ?
Thank you
Damien GUIHAL
Nantes, France
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:37:24PM +0200, Olaf Grewe wrote:
> >I would like to install Debian ppc but there are many files and I don't
>
> >know well what I must download and install, there isn't a cdrom image ?
>
> >
> There are several around, so you might want to try one of these:
>
> ftp://f
>I would like to install Debian ppc but there are many files and I don't
>know well what I must download and install, there isn't a cdrom image ?
>
There are several around, so you might want to try one of these:
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/cdimage.debian.org/2.2_rev2/powerpc
ftp://ftp.proxa
I would like to install Debian ppc but there are many files and I don't
know well what I must download and install, there isn't a cdrom image ?
with -DEAPI, in past I tried to
> remove (rpm -e Apache...) but then I'd many trouble with starting all
> service (something like "cannot find service at runlevel 2" and I've
> reinstalled all Linux) so I'm afraid with reinstallig Apache.
> There are Apache t
image from HFS partition, a very strange thing is
that I cannot install Jserv, it say me that mod_jserv can crash if
compiled with -EAPI and ricompile it with -DEAPI, in past I tried to
remove (rpm -e Apache...) but then I'd many trouble with starting all
service (something like "ca
> Lorenzo De Vito wrote:
>
> Do you know where I can find Apache (complete) ??
What do you mean exactly? You can apt-get install apache apache-doc and get the
latest version of apache in debian.
You can go to www.apache.org to download the source.
A search on google.com will give y
Do you know where I can find Apache (complete)
??
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 11:59:14AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> > After an apt-get update, -upgrade I tried dist-upgrade today. But,
> > huh? I did't tell to remove apache or other services!
>
> I think this is another &quo
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> After an apt-get update, -upgrade I tried dist-upgrade today. But,
> huh? I did't tell to remove apache or other services!
I think this is another "Great Perl Upgrade" with massive associated breakage.
For now, I'm holding all of the
After an apt-get update, -upgrade I tried dist-upgrade today. But,
huh? I did't tell to remove apache or other services!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following packages will be RE
Changing the /etc/hosts as you advised did it. Thanks.
her.dom' etc.
>
> /etc/hostname would be:
> yourMachine
>
>
> Restart the machine once the settings are correct.
>
> Andre
>
>
> Joshua Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [1 ]
> > I'm trying to learn apache. W
tc/hostname would be:
yourMachine
Restart the machine once the settings are correct.
Andre
Joshua Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> I'm trying to learn apache. When I run it I get
> 'Apache: Cannot determine local hostname'
> Does the h
Also, I said no to the 'are you connected to a network?' option during
debian installation. So do I need to set the domain name, IP address, netmask,
etc? How do you re-set that stuff? Is there a config file with that info?
I'm trying to learn apache. When I run it I get
'Apache: Cannot determine local hostname'
Does the hostname have to be set up with my service provider or something?
I set the ServerName directive to my hostname.domain.com (hostname is what's in my /etc/hostname file, and I ha
Hi,
I need to install apache-ssl on ppc, but the dependencies are messing
things entirely too much. The following is the difference with i386
and the suggested straightforward improvement.
Sergio
* Dependencies on i386:
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1),
libgdb
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 01:04:01PM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> I was just hoping that someone who knew for sure would be able to reply.
> I'm assuming if the autobuilder fails to build a package, SOMEone gets
> notified. Then the question becomes, who does anything get done about
> it. :)
Hart
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:10:56PM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> > > Now, I checked the bug list, and it says that the dependency problem for
> > > apache-common on "perl" has been fixed, with apache-common_1.3.6-14.
> > > Message date wa
I'll try to be a little clearer.
Robert Ramiega wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:10:56PM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> > Now, I checked the bug list, and it says that the dependency problem for
> > apache-common on "perl" has been fixed, with apache-comm
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 10:39:02AM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> Hey Robert,
>
> I'm writing this because you may not realize that your reply to
> Jeremiah was a little harsh and flip. Maybe you guys know each other,
oops! I *really* didn't realize that and i really didn't mean to
irritat
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:10:56PM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> Now, I checked the bug list, and it says that the dependency problem for
> apache-common on "perl" has been fixed, with apache-common_1.3.6-14.
> Message date was July 12th.
What stops You from using apache_1.3
Now, I checked the bug list, and it says that the dependency problem for
apache-common on "perl" has been fixed, with apache-common_1.3.6-14.
Message date was July 12th.
So is the autobuilder just not doing its job? Or are there other
concerns why it hasn't been put into our unstab
Hi!
> Ugh, in which way, not loadable??
Incorrect statement from my side. It would have better been "thrown out
by apt because of dependencies". I actually don't know if they really
are not loadable, but after apt removes them, they _will_ be unloadable
;-)
bye, Georg
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 07:45:33PM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > The new apache in the powerpc directories now breaks the apache modules.
> > Will those be uploaded any time soon? It's not a big problem, but it
> > would actually be nice to have all parts together ;-)
> The new apache in the powerpc directories now breaks the apache modules.
> Will those be uploaded any time soon? It's not a big problem, but it
> would actually be nice to have all parts together ;-)
Ugh, in which way, not loadable??
MfG,
Hartmut
Hi!
The new apache in the powerpc directories now breaks the apache modules.
Will those be uploaded any time soon? It's not a big problem, but it
would actually be nice to have all parts together ;-)
bye, Georg
55 matches
Mail list logo
