Re: 2.6.3-rc2-ben1 build error

2004-02-17 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 06:59:11PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 05:58:08PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > > > > Yes I remember fixing that in 2.6.2-rc, but it builds fine > > here too. Except for a problem I encounter during boot, after: > > Ben, did you screw up the

Re: 2.6.3-rc2-ben1 build error

2004-02-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 05:58:08PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > > > Or maybe is just me O:-S > > > > This looks like a screwed up tree, at least in 2.6.3-rc2 > > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h doesn't exist anymore. > > Yes I remember fixing that in 2.6.2-rc, but it builds fine > here too. Except for a pro

Re: 2.6.3-rc2-ben1 build error

2004-02-15 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 05:35:47PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 04:08:21PM +0100, Domingo Fiesta Segura wrote: > > I attach the error log. I took a look at te file fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h; the > > compiler doesn't recognise the page_buf_t. Maybe there's some missing > > incl

Re: 2.6.3-rc2-ben1 build error

2004-02-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 04:08:21PM +0100, Domingo Fiesta Segura wrote: > Hi, > > I attach the error log. I took a look at te file fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h; the > compiler doesn't recognise the page_buf_t. Maybe there's some missing > include in that file or the file that includes it. > > Or maybe is ju

2.6.3-rc2-ben1 build error

2004-02-15 Thread Domingo Fiesta Segura
Hi, I attach the error log. I took a look at te file fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h; the compiler doesn't recognise the page_buf_t. Maybe there's some missing include in that file or the file that includes it. Or maybe is just me O:-S make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts rm -rf .tmp_versions mkdir -p .