On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:33:57PM -0400, Josh Huber wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Pernegger) writes:
>
> >> (it's better for your health not to CC: Branden, he doesn't like that... :)
> >
> > Ok, sorry...
>
> he does have M-C-T: none set, does Mutt 1.2.5 not honor this field?
mutt honor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Pernegger) writes:
>> (it's better for your health not to CC: Branden, he doesn't like that... :)
>
> Ok, sorry...
he does have M-C-T: none set, does Mutt 1.2.5 not honor this field?
ttyl,
--
Josh Huber | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> (it's better for your health not to CC: Branden, he doesn't like that... :)
Ok, sorry...
> No, but would you accept a fix instead? ;)
>
> Panning used to be broken in aty128fb. If you can't or don't want to use
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt's kernel (which has the fix), try this patch:
>
> http://
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:12:46AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > No, I had to remove it. It broke r128 for everybody with an Intel box.
> >
> > Who cares? ;)
>
> I should have mentioned this before, but see bugs: #107349, #107383,
> #10
(it's better for your health not to CC: Branden, he doesn't like that... :)
Christian Pernegger wrote:
>
> > > Hmm, I don't have UseFBDev but this change was not in the update in
> > > question or was it?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> X starts now but I can't say it works. I used 1024x1800 (I think) as
> th
> > Hmm, I don't have UseFBDev but this change was not in the update in
> > question or was it?
>
> Yes.
X starts now but I can't say it works. I used 1024x1800 (I think) as
the virtual screen size - made web pages bearable on the 800x600
display.
Unfortunately that doesn't work anymore. The vir
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:12:39AM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote:
> > > Branden, do you still use this patch:
> > >
> > > * patch #152: David Gibson's Rage128 fix for video mode saving and
> > > restoring
> > > when there is no video BIOS (such as on a PowerPC...)
> > >
> > > ? It's req
Christian Pernegger wrote:
>
> > > Branden, do you still use this patch:
> > >
> > > * patch #152: David Gibson's Rage128 fix for video mode saving and
> > > restoring when there is no video BIOS (such as on a PowerPC...)
> > >
> > > ? It's required for Macs without UseFBDev.
> >
> > No, I h
Liam Bedford wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:05:25PM -0500, Charles Sebold came forth with:
On 18 Elul 5761, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Unfortunately, noone has come up with anything but a hack about this
problem... So until it gets sorted out, people should use UseFBDev.
If one uses UseFBDev,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:05:25PM -0500, Charles Sebold came forth with:
> On 18 Elul 5761, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, noone has come up with anything but a hack about this
> > problem... So until it gets sorted out, people should use UseFBDev.
>
> If one uses UseFBDev, does that
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:12:46AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > No, I had to remove it. It broke r128 for everybody with an Intel box.
>
> Who cares? ;)
I should have mentioned this before, but see bugs: #107349, #107383,
#107412, #108601, #108659.
I guess there is
> > Branden, do you still use this patch:
> >
> > * patch #152: David Gibson's Rage128 fix for video mode saving and
> > restoring
> > when there is no video BIOS (such as on a PowerPC...)
> >
> > ? It's required for Macs without UseFBDev.
>
> No, I had to remove it. It broke r128 for ev
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:33:18AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote:
> > I have an iBook FW 366 on which I track unstable quite closely. Now
> > this last upgrade from Debian revision 3 to 4 totally broke X on that
> > machine - th
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Charles Sebold wrote:
> If one uses UseFBDev, does that mean one can't use DRI?
That would be a resounding "No". I have used 16bpp, with UseFBDev, on this
FireWire iBook, and DRI works fine. (Well, as fine as it does. The r128
driver still has lingering issues, but that's noth
On 18 Elul 5761, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Unfortunately, noone has come up with anything but a hack about this
> problem... So until it gets sorted out, people should use UseFBDev.
If one uses UseFBDev, does that mean one can't use DRI?
I ask because I too have had problems doing anything but UseF
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:19:42PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Christian Pernegger wrote:
> > >
> > > I have an iBook FW 366 on which I track unstable quite closely. Now
> > > this last upgrade from Debian revision 3 to 4 totally broke X on that
> > > machine - the
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:19:42PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Christian Pernegger wrote:
> >
> > I have an iBook FW 366 on which I track unstable quite closely. Now
> > this last upgrade from Debian revision 3 to 4 totally broke X on that
> > machine - the X server SIG11s at startup... :( Nothi
Christian Pernegger wrote:
>
> I have an iBook FW 366 on which I track unstable quite closely. Now
> this last upgrade from Debian revision 3 to 4 totally broke X on that
> machine - the X server SIG11s at startup... :( Nothing in the
> configuration was changed at all.
Branden, do you still use
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote:
> I have an iBook FW 366 on which I track unstable quite closely. Now
> this last upgrade from Debian revision 3 to 4 totally broke X on that
> machine - the X server SIG11s at startup... :( Nothing in the
> configuration was chan
I have an iBook FW 366 on which I track unstable quite closely. Now
this last upgrade from Debian revision 3 to 4 totally broke X on that
machine - the X server SIG11s at startup... :( Nothing in the
configuration was changed at all.
Is anyone else getting this behaviour?
Regards
Christian
20 matches
Mail list logo
