Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL (revisited..)

2001-02-22 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:23:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thanks for the help on binutils-dev > > > see above. you will also need to apply my patch to get it to link > > later. my patch also fixes make install to go into /usr/local where > > it belongs. > > I also found the patc

Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL (revisited..)

2001-02-22 Thread wcrowshaw
Thanks for the help on binutils-dev > see above. you will also need to apply my patch to get it to link > later. my patch also fixes make install to go into /usr/local where > it belongs. I also found the patches that you mentioned posted in the list archive. After I was finally successful i

Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL (revisited..)

2001-02-21 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:02:40AM -0600, Charles Sebold wrote: > On 27 Shevat 5761, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Problem is that I ran into a build problem that i can't figure > > out. I searched the archives and found no similar compile problem. > > Compile fails, and I think it has something

Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL (revisited..)

2001-02-21 Thread Charles Sebold
On 27 Shevat 5761, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Problem is that I ran into a build problem that i can't figure > out. I searched the archives and found no similar compile problem. > Compile fails, and I think it has something to do with missing > headers. Here's the beginning of the stderr output.

Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL (revisited..)

2001-02-20 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 03:19:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -- > > ++ BUILDING ++ > Entering '/usr/src/mol-0.9.53/debugger' > Entering '/usr/src/mol-0.9.53/debugger/../mon' > gcc -pipe -O2 -Wall -fomit-frame-pointer -mmultiple -I../include -c -o > ppc-dis.o ppc-dis.c > In file included

Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL (revisited..)

2001-02-20 Thread wcrowshaw
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 02:44:37PM -0600, Charles Sebold wrote: > On 24 Shevat 5761, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am happily running MOL right this minute with 2.2.18 and potato. > > I don't think I would ever upgrade my kernel without compiling it > myself, by the way. Too likely to bring abo

Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL

2001-02-19 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Parallelizing fsck version 1.18 (11-Nov-1999) > fsck.ext2: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/sdb5 > (null): > > Now /dev/sdb5 is my root partition. How can I fix this problem? What should Perhaps build the 2.4 kernel without devfs support. Michael

Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL

2001-02-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 01:18:55PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am trying to get mol running on my debian potato install. I downloaded > the mol rpm of version 0.9.53-2, aliened and installed it. After a few > other steps I, molstart notified me that it needs kernel 2.0.4-test10. So you d

Re: [Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL

2001-02-17 Thread Charles Sebold
On 24 Shevat 5761, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am trying to get mol running on my debian potato install. I > downloaded the mol rpm of version 0.9.53-2, aliened and installed > it. After a few other steps I, molstart notified me that it needs > kernel 2.0.4-test10. As far as this part of your

[Q] Upgrading the kernel to run MOL

2001-02-17 Thread wcrowshaw
I am trying to get mol running on my debian potato install. I downloaded the mol rpm of version 0.9.53-2, aliened and installed it. After a few other steps I, molstart notified me that it needs kernel 2.0.4-test10. So I found a pre-compiled version on the net, and set it up as follows: As root, I