On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:24:50PM -0800, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm learning the PPC architecture and I have a PowerBook G4 (7410)
> 500MHz. Looking at the datasheet for the processor, it has support for
> hardware speculation which allows out-of-order execution.
>
> I wanted
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:25:03 +0530
"Sujit Karataparambil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're right, I guess we can't disable the "hardware" directly but if
> > we let gcc know about this then it is possible that it will do further
> > optimizations correct?
> What sort of run time issues can add
> You're right, I guess we can't disable the "hardware" directly but if
> we let gcc know about this then it is possible that it will do further
> optimizations correct?
What sort of run time issues can addressed on an runtime usage.
> For example, I can compile a C program using regular gcc witho
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:13:46 +1100
Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amit Uttamchandani writes:
>
> > I'm learning the PPC architecture and I have a PowerBook G4 (7410)
> > 500MHz. Looking at the datasheet for the processor, it has support for
> > hardware speculation which allows out-of
Amit Uttamchandani writes:
> I'm learning the PPC architecture and I have a PowerBook G4 (7410)
> 500MHz. Looking at the datasheet for the processor, it has support for
> hardware speculation which allows out-of-order execution.
>
> I wanted to test program run times by compiling using gcc with f
Hey guys,
I'm learning the PPC architecture and I have a PowerBook G4 (7410)
500MHz. Looking at the datasheet for the processor, it has support for
hardware speculation which allows out-of-order execution.
I wanted to test program run times by compiling using gcc with flags
that enable and then d
6 matches
Mail list logo
