On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 08:49:01PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
>
> > Please, check the current release before you start discussions like
> > this! The current kernel packages have not had this enabled in months.
> >
> > Dan
> Is this the same one that wouldn't boot w
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Please, check the current release before you start discussions like
> this! The current kernel packages have not had this enabled in months.
>
> Dan
Is this the same one that wouldn't boot without disabling the "Please enter the
root disk" prompt?
I'm glad I mirror
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:21:48PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:15:31PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > > > Look in /boot/vmlinux-2.2.17, you'll see.
> > > >
> > > > Ethan, wh
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > This seems to be exactly what happened to my system (kernel 2.2.18/
> > oldworld)--it didn't boot without the monitor attached. Upon reading
>
> What model?
>
PowerMac 9600/200
regards,
abe
--
We need to do what we need to do. -- George W. Bush
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > BOOTX_TEXT is a misnomor though, it really doesn't have much to do
> > with BootX at all. its also not required for either BootX or
> > non-BootX booting.
> >
> Why do we need BOOTX_TEXT in the debian kernel? Is the installer using
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:21:48PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:15:31PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > > Look in /boot/vmlinux-2.2.17, you'll see.
> > >
> > > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik?
> >
> > At least t
Takehiko Abe wrote:
>
> Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> > > > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik?
> > >
> > > At least the 7200, I believe.
> >
> > correct, i talked to ben about this recently the problem is the way
> > this particular feature trys to access the OF framebuffe
Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik?
> >
> > At least the 7200, I believe.
>
> correct, i talked to ben about this recently the problem is the way
> this particular feature trys to access the OF framebuffer, on
> oldworlds with non-existant o
>: >
>: > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik?
>:
>: At least the 7200, I believe.
>:
and PB3400c
0.02 euro
Claus
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:21:48PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:15:31PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > Look in /boot/vmlinux-2.2.17, you'll see.
> >
> > Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik?
>
> At least the 7200, I believe.
correct, i tal
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:15:31PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Look in /boot/vmlinux-2.2.17, you'll see.
>
> Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik?
At least the 7200, I believe.
> What benefit do you get by enabling this option? I've compiled kernels for my
> g3 with CO
Look in /boot/vmlinux-2.2.17, you'll see.
Ethan, what kind of machines need CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n with quik?
What benefit do you get by enabling this option? I've compiled kernels for my
g3 with CONFIG_BOOTX_TEXT=n and using bootx without trouble.
I've heard that this option does more than just g
12 matches
Mail list logo
