Re: Sockoban

2000-03-16 Thread danielt
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Jon Leonard wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:37:09PM +0100, Björn Johansson wrote: > > Hi! > > > > In the Red Hat distribution there exist a couple of funny games. Sockoban is > > one of my favourites. Will it be part of the Debian distribution? Do anyone > > know if this

Re: Storm Linux 2000

2000-02-29 Thread danielt
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, [iso-8859-1] Björn Johansson wrote: > Hi! > > What do you think about Storm Linux 2000? I've been reading a little about > it, and according to them, it's more easy to install than Debian although > it's been built on Debian. Is Storm Linux 2000 a threat to Debian or is it >

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread danielt
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Sergio Brandano wrote: > > I am now on an Intel platform, and my dpkg says: > > >Package: netbase > >Priority: standard > >Section: base > >Installed-Size: 1069 > >Maintainer: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Architecture: i386 > >Version: 3.16-7 > >Replaces: netstd (<<

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread danielt
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Sergio Brandano wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Recommended fix: reduce the dependency of netbase on netstd > >to a "suggests". > > netstd is labeled as obsolete > netbase still depends on netstd!!! > Then perhaps it should be reduced further. Obviously _someone

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread danielt
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Nathan Olsen wrote: > >I'm having some trouble not installing fingerd, rwhod and the rest of > >the r* gang. Trouble is that netstd 3.07-10 depends on them and > >netbase 3.16-2 in turn recommends netstd. dselect won't let me get > >rid of netstd without dumping netbase, too