Hi
On 13/07/2021 21:35, Karoly Balogh wrote:
> Just to note it here, this CPU family is also used by some relatively
> recent desktop-class PowerPC machines, like A-Eon's AmigaOne X5000 (and
> its "CyrusPlus" motherboard). So it's not just about the support of some
> obscure embedded dev board.
Hi,
>> I am however not sure that my current choices for the ppc64 and powerpc
>> baselines are optimal, hence this thread.
If i can help you i'll be happy to. I have several Powermac G5 running
current Debian i can use one to test your packages as long as you tell
me please a little about the
sure how this is relevant to the question whether the bug was fixed
>> or not in the Debian kernel package.
> Not relevant. It was just to say that the tester's job has become much
> easier meanwhile.
>
--
William Bonnet
GPG : 7189 DC8E 15B9 B3E4 EA3E 902B 8EAC
hines are just fine: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi)
Thanks, i am going to write to the DSA team. Is there some specific
documentation to read about binNMU contributions ? (i mean something
else than https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU)
Cheers
W.
--
William BONNET
CTO & Founder / The IT Makers
Hi all,
I am currently working (office work) on a project using PPC64 based
boards, each board is running a NXP e5500 processor. We plan to use
Debian, and thus the PPC64 port. So, I have tested the version from
debian-ports, it is almost working, but it seems that packages have been
compiled with
5 matches
Mail list logo