Re: powstatd package is in sid for powerpc

2000-01-18 Thread Peter S Galbraith
t built for such arches and this would have helped, I would have done them first! :-) > I imagine > xplot was the same problem although I see no log. Same thing. libforms-dev. Thanks. > On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 01:59:49PM -050

Re: powstatd package is in sid for powerpc

2000-01-17 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Look a little closer at the symlinks. > /debian2/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-powerpc is a symlink into sid. > That'll go away after freeze, for woody. > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 09:35:40AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > I jus

Re: powstatd package is in sid for powerpc

2000-01-17 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Look a little closer at the symlinks. > /debian2/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-powerpc is a symlink into sid. > That'll go away after freeze, for woody. > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 09:35:40AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > I jus

Re: powstatd package is in sid for powerpc

2000-01-17 Thread Peter S Galbraith
I wrote: > I just noticed that my powstatd package (a ups-monitor) is in sid > for powerpc: > > $ locate admin/powstatd | grep binary > /debian2/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-alpha/admin/powstatd_1.4.1-3.deb > /debian2/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/admin/powstatd_1.4.1-3.deb > /debian2/

powstatd package is in sid for powerpc

2000-01-17 Thread Peter S Galbraith
I just noticed that my powstatd package (a ups-monitor) is in sid for powerpc: $ locate admin/powstatd | grep binary /debian2/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-alpha/admin/powstatd_1.4.1-3.deb /debian2/debian/dists/potato/main/binary-i386/admin/powstatd_1.4.1-3.deb /debian2/debian/dists/potato/main/

Re: xforms

1999-12-20 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Same goes for contrib or not? Same goes for non-us or not? A note about this should go `somewhere' into the developer's docs. I always assumes autobuilders worked regardless of main, contrib, non-free, non-us. Thanks for the heads-up, Peter Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > The complete lack of an a

Re: Request another powerpc compilation of libforms0.89

1999-10-20 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Matt Porter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 12:59:38PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > A few days ago, I uploaded another, hopefully fixed, bersion of > > libforms0.89_0.89-2 to master.debian.org:~psg/. It's supposed to > > build on powerpc (it's the only

Request another powerpc compilation of libforms0.89

1999-10-20 Thread Peter S Galbraith
[I don't subscribe to this list. Please CC replies to me.] A few days ago, I uploaded another, hopefully fixed, bersion of libforms0.89_0.89-2 to master.debian.org:~psg/. It's supposed to build on powerpc (it's the only non-i386 we currently have the non-source library for). I emailed Matt abou

Re: Request a powerpc compilation of libforms0.89

1999-10-15 Thread Peter S Galbraith
ing. Thanks for your time. It's not waisted on me. Peter Matt Porter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 12:39:17PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > [I don't subscribe to this list. Please CC replies to me.] > > > > I just uploaded libforms0.89_0.89-2 to ma

Request a powerpc compilation of libforms0.89

1999-10-15 Thread Peter S Galbraith
[I don't subscribe to this list. Please CC replies to me.] I just uploaded libforms0.89_0.89-2 to master's incoming. It's supposed to build on powerpc (it's the only non-i386 we currently have the non-source library for). Would someone mind downloading the source, trying it out (it's a drop-in