On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:06:55AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Aug 24 2007, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This sounds like #429662 which appears to be caused by Bluetooth
> > refusing to suspend.
> Would it even interfere with a kernel that *doesn't* have bluetooth
>
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:50:10AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> * suspend to RAM only works with kernel 2.6.21 (I tried the one that is
> shipped with Debian).
> Upgrading to the 2.6.22 (which is in unstable) or compiling my own
> 2.6.23-rc3 (taken from kernel.org) doesn't let me sleep: it
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:00:01PM +0200, Georg Heinrich wrote:
> Unfortunately I could not get the fwcutter with apt-get. I needed to download
> bcm43xx-fwcutter_006-1_powerpc.deb
> instead/
Since it is only useful with the non-free Broadcomm firmware the package
is in the contrib archive ra
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 08:00:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Sure, apple used to over-power the USB connectors on the older ibooks
> and powerbooks, which is why it works. I don't know why they stopped
> doing this later on, but apparently they did.
Probably when they stopped making USB devices
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:34:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> But I have another concern. In my experience, some debian source
> packages do not build on G5 running the Debian powerpc port because
> their ./configure scripts get confused by the "ppc64" string in the
> uname output. Depending o
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:06:08PM +, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> AFAIK Sven Luther has not contributed to this thread and seems to be
> banned from posting on debian lists. Thus it strikes me that to bring
Sven hasn't been banned, he decided of his own accord to take a break
for two months:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:53:59AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> That is porting. There is little porting work in buildd maintenance; all
> you ever do is sign successful logs, interpret failures, and file
> appropriate bugs (although many buildd maintainers, myself included,
> seem to think the
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:44:12AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 December 2006 12:52, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I would like to recommend that only persons who do volunteer to be
> > reactive would be listed here.
> This mail is bcc:ed to those listed on that wiki page, to see if th
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:12:08PM -0500, Rich Johnson wrote:
[It'd probably be useful to tell the people over on debian-boot about
the problems you've seen.]
> Oh, I get that all right.Where you lose me is the rationale for
> the bootstrap/installer being incomplete in the first place. Wh
I'm having serious performance problems with DRI on the R128 in a G4
Cube using kernel 2.6 and unstable. I can quite happly run without DRI
enabled, getting acceptable performance (obviously with no 3D
acceleration) but as soon as I enable the DRI module the CPU usage of
the X server goes sky high
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:15:09PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Before I prepare a 2.4.20 update for stable, I'd like some people to try
> them out and report success. So if you have hardware that plain old 2.4.20
> can handle and don't need -benh9johnhQac37 to get your foobar to baz
> prope
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 10:50:43AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> Do you have any plans to try to integrate this with the cpu temperature
> detection so that it would automagically downclock when it runs too hot
> for too long?
Surely that's something that should be done in user space?
--
"You gr
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 07:14 PM, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
The only thing that I can think of is that there is or was a toolchain
bug
on the powerpc that built the last libmm debs (and the libmm12 deb). If
you built them, what versions of the toolchain packages are you
running?
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 06:43 PM, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
I'm a bit tied up with other work now, but I'll see if I can find out
what
path has assigned to it.
I wouldn't worry about it so much if the problem goes away with MMFILE -
I do have an upload forcing the shm type to th
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:43:23AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> Good idea. MMFILE is probably the safest, although I'm still puzzled as
> to why IPCSHM seems to be so flaky.
> It proved one thing: that compiling against libmm12 didn't make a
> difference :-P I still get the same prob
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:07:02AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> I just posted a follow-up to that bug report, complete with some
> experimentation results. To summarise, either double your shmmax or
> recompile libmm11 with --with-shm=MMFILE. Looks like there's a bug
> somewhere WRT I
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:48:34PM +0200, Rubin wrote:
> I've seen this workaround being tried on the alpha platform but as far
> as I can see this does not work for powerpc. What changed between
> 1.1.3-6 and 1.1.3-7 that breaks php in this case? Maybe a /usr/doc/libmm
Nothing. PHP keeps on
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 06:46:50PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The eth1: timeout messages seem to be a bug in the airport driver.
> Mine spits them out all the time (and others when it resets the card)
> but still seems to work. I've been able to eliminate them almost
IME these messages ha
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 05:44:01PM +, rod brookes wrote:
> insmod dmasound sound on...reboot sound is off
> modprobe dmasound esd sound on...reboot sound is off!
> Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong please?
Loading a module isn't quite the same as installing a device driver
under other
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:42:41PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving me a log of
> the actual failure (which will require dropping that silly redirection
> from debian/rules), you're just guessing.
Sent by private mail.
--
"You grabbe
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> (opt-in) maintainers about
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:18:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> What do you mean by "the build report"? Do you mean bug report
> 121459?
The bug, sorry.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
pgppEauWGvXT6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Please note that I haven't filed any bug of that sort (I rarely do these
> days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and logs). FYI:
It's worth telling to maintainers - a huge proportion won't pay any
attention unl
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:21:52PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error
> > as in the build report.
> What version of apt do you have installed?
0.5.4. Why?
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:10:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I would like to close bug 121459, and rely on powerpc to attempt a
> build by the normal process and report a new bug against the current
Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error
as in the build
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:14:18PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 19:35, Mark Brown wrote:
> > As it stands, it's pretty darn fast with just the framebuffer driver -
> > unless I try to run something that uses OpenGL I have completely failed
>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:22:44PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> By then it will be perfect. ;) Seriously, XFree86 4.2.0 will be out
> which offers very decent support for the graphics chip. The rest of the
As it stands, it's pretty darn fast with just the framebuffer driver -
unless I try to run
I've just tried to reproduce this bug on PowerPC and failed. I'm
guessing that the failure must have been caused by some failure in some
other part of the system (possibly autoconf) which has since been
resolved. The referenced build log[1] shows the failure apparently
being due to the absence of
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 04:03:52AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> Another occurrence of reusing a va_list variable. Although in this
> case, it looks like it was just an oversight. In addition to fixing
That worked. I'm uploading just now.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a da
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 06:03:00PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Additionally, this machine seems to periodically time-warp to 1904 -- I
> > assume
> > that it has no internal battery to power the RTC when the battery and mains
> > power is disconnected?
> Bingo. Something like ntp is your fri
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:27:29AM +0100, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:05:20PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/cd-images/2.2_rev4.1/powerpc/
> That sounds really good. It's a pity the server wants a username and
> password.
> Are there any openl
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:28:55PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > When I asked about working on stuff I was told to just upload stuff if
> > it built. What's the party line?
> I can't/don't/won't speak for Dan,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:37:49PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Requeue Needed (builds fine for me)
> --
> scsitools - wish should be installed properly.
> netdude - no failure log for latest version.
> netcfg - no failure log (old - 2001 Jun 18)
When I asked about working on st
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:45:31PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> In my experience, the Cube doesn't compare too badly with an Athlon 800.
> YMMV.
It's certainly an awful lot faster than a K6-II/500. I wonder if
Albert's running with an OpenFirmware framebuffer only? That would make
everything a
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 10:06:14PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:49:59PM -0800, ozymandias G desiderata wrote:
> > There is, however, a workaround, grotty thought it may be. I forked a
> > shell and created, initialized, and mounted all of the partitions on
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:49:59PM -0800, ozymandias G desiderata wrote:
> There is, however, a workaround, grotty thought it may be. I forked a
> shell and created, initialized, and mounted all of the partitions on
> the disk by hand. I also had to run mkofboot / ybin by hand from the
> shell, as
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:14:18PM -0700, Derrik Pates wrote:
> When booting, the system should come to a 'boot:' prompt. Type 'debian
> video=ofonly' at the prompt, this should force the (admittedly aging)
> kernel to use the OpenFirmware console device, which won't be fast, but
> will be enough
I'm trying to get Debian up and running on a Cube. So far I've been
unable to find an installation system which will run on the machine.
With both potato and current woody installers I find that the kernel
doesn't succeed in displaying anything on the framebuffer which makes
the installer kind of
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:50:28AM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> At any rate, I'm just happy to have X running at all, even if it's using
> the FB driver :-)
The performance is certainly more than adequate for what I use X for :-)
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a da
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> DefaultDepth depth
> specifies which color depth the server should use by default.
> The -depth command line option can be used to override this. If
> neither is specified, the default depth is driver-specifi
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:21:03AM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> work on it some more. In the meantime, I've discovered that the only
> reason that my colourmap was screwed up under X using the framebuffer
> Xserver was because of the default fb depth (which is 8). When I did
> 'fbset
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 01:29:39AM +, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > I'd question having the dependancy in the first place, though -
> > nothing else with similar needs (lm-sensors for example) does that
> > and it is unhelpful if one doesn&#x
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 11:02:33PM +0100, Nik wrote:
> perhaps mol-modules-source should also provide "mol-modules"?
Have you taken a look at the result of using mol-modules-source? The
package produced is what's needed to satisfy the dependancy, not the
sources for the modules.
I'd question h
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 08:36:03PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> I've got X semi-working on my new TiBook using the fb driver, but the
> colourmap is really screwed up. I'm working on extracting the Radeon M6
Sounds like about where I am. Wierd thing is the colourmap was fine
when usi
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:27:03AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> The framebuffer device should display any mode passed to it by the X
> server. Do you have an 1152x768 mode definition in your XF86Config
> (there is no such mode built into the server yet) and use that?
I didn't - a couple people s
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 06:31:19PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> I've been trying to get my new TiBook set up for Debian. So far (thanks
> to the guide Branden provided) the only real sticking point is X. Has
> anyone got any suggestions on how to get the server running?
Just to cla
I've been trying to get my new TiBook set up for Debian. So far (thanks
to the guide Branden provided) the only real sticking point is X. Has
anyone got any suggestions on how to get the server running?
Rather than try building and installing the CVS X server I've been
attempting to use the fram
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 07:49:55PM +1100, Brendan J Simon wrote:
> basestation and/or vice-versa. I would like something a bit more secure.
As someone else said, you can have a Linux PC do NAT for you. As far as
the security bit goes, you might wish to consider running IPsec over the
wireless n
Before I go and do something stupid, does any one have any particular
(dis)recommendations about using the newer iBooks with Debian? Looking
at the spec and grovelling around on the web it seems they do reasonably
well.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
49 matches
Mail list logo
