Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

2009-12-18 Thread Luk Claes
Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2009, Philipp Kern wrote: >> While I did not take care about the fallout due to time constraints on >> my side, I did take a look at the meta-gnome2 migration back then. We >> did not place any approval hint but it seems that the multiple arch:all >> confus

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Luk Claes
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc issues. While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time permits, I can't take any kind of leading role at this time, and I&#x

Re: No port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Luk Claes
Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Hi! As you have sent me the link personally on IRC I guess you are looking for my input to the thread, so I answer. :) Well, not in particular, but I saw you mentioned on the Etch page ;-) * Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-26 11:04:24 CEST]: Plea

No port maintainers?

2007-10-26 Thread Luk Claes
Hi Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc issues. Feel free to complete the page for the other criteria as well... Cheers Luk [0] http://wiki.debian.org/powerpcLennyReleaseRecertification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: Release architecture requalification

2007-09-29 Thread Luk Claes
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 04:21:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 02:54:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Hi porters > > > > To make sure we deliver quality for all the architectures we support, we > > want to start the architecture requalifi

Release architecture requalification

2007-09-29 Thread Luk Claes
Hi porters To make sure we deliver quality for all the architectures we support, we want to start the architecture requalification process from scratch again. Therefor we invite people to create and fill in the respective wiki pages. Please only add yourself to the wiki page when you are an active

FTBFS due to dynamic variable `_SDA_BASE_@@WXU_2.6' is zero size

2005-09-24 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi My package poedit FTBFS on the buildd with: g++ -ggdb -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.6 - -I/usr/include/wx-2.6 -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ - -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE=1 - -DNO_GCC_PRAGMA -DDB_O