On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 13:23:40 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After some xorg driver packages were removed from the archive in #955603 [1]
> that we still need for Debian Ports, I was wondering whether it's okay when
> I take over maintainership and upload the packages to uns
On 07/02/2018 06:32 AM, Christian Marillat wrote:
> On 26 juin 2018 09:42, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> [bcc: DSA]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> with jessie being EOL, there is no supported release for the powerpc
>> port. As such, DSA will shortly shut down the powerp
On 06/27/2018 10:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As part of the interim architecture qualification for buster, we request
> that DSA, the security team and the toolchain maintainers review and
> update their list of known concerns for buster release architectures.
>
Everyone, please avoi
[bcc: DSA]
Hi,
with jessie being EOL, there is no supported release for the powerpc
port. As such, DSA will shortly shut down the powerpc buildds it runs.
Cheers,
Julien
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 22:14:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> My intent in _this_ thread was to get a discussion among
> debian-ports.org users started for best practices of how
> to communicate with package maintainers in Debian. Sorry
> for being unclear there. I had hoped for hints ☺ since I
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:45:18 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 02:24 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 20:43 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [...]
> > > * Could some Mac users test and report whether i915 or nouveau can
> > > successfully take over the di
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 17:43:57 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> tags 603986 + help
> thanks
>
> I personally have not access to a PPC to do any trial, and using
You have access to debian's porter box...
> qgis in remote would be a pain, I guess. It seems Heisenbug Principle
> in this ca
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:14:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.11.2010 13:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> >>For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
> >>(turning
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:29:07 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> > What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to so
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 15:43:57 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs
> (turning on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The
> rationale is summarized in
> http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking. I would like to know
> about i
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:57:35 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Can the problem be worked around by running the affected apps with the
> environment variable SDL_ALTIVEC_BLIT_FEATURES=0?
>
> If yes, SDL_HasAltiVec() may just incorrectly return true on
> non-Altivec-capable systems.
>
> If no, app
11 matches
Mail list logo
