Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:30:55AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > > Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
> > > > > multiarch powerpc port ?
> > > >
> > >
Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Ok, where is the debian powerpc64 machine, which is needed for the
> > > multiarch powerpc port ?
> >
> > Where is the official multiarch powerpc port that needs a Debian
> > powerpc64 machine?
>
> Well, there is andreas jochens pure-ppc64 effort eating loads of space on
Sven Luther wrote:
> But basically, you are telling me that i should take my server, and fork
> debian. Well, i guess given how i have been handled lately, i am
> seriously considering this. The debian infrastructure guys probably need
> some serious competition in order to be kept agile :)
If you
Sven Luther wrote:
> > The DSA team does not add random machines. There is no ppc64 port,
> > there is no need for ppc64 machines, there are powerpc build daemons
> > and there's a powerpc porter machine which is not overloaded. Thus,
> > no need for more machines, thus no more machines will be a
Sven Luther wrote:
> But the DSA team have refused to even consider those augsbourg machines,
> probably because they where overloaded, and unwilling to share the work,
> a bit like it is happening with the arm or sparc ports, where new
> hardware was proposed, but ignored or rejected.
Thanks Sven
5 matches
Mail list logo
