sn't in CVS yet, and I have no idea
what's up with Sparc. So it doesn't seem like post of the arch bugs are
in CVS right now. I hope we can change that, though.
Let's see how necessary it is. We can always do a CVS pull after this
upload.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
done before my wife wakes up and demands the computer. =)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:41:45PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > sparc:
> Sparc is me. Getting it tonight.
Ah, thanks. I wasn't sure if you had time for it these days. Lemme
know if I can help with anything.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
At last you cry out in anguish: "Why me?
Fellow porters,
Your Glibc maintainer team is trying to get glibc 2.3 ready for
general consumption, and we need some help for arch's that we're not
familiar with. So far we have the following covered:
i386: Jeff Bailey, GOTO Masanori
hurd-i386: Jeff Bailey
ppc: Jack Howawth
a
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:23:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> hurd - should bootstrap (CVS 010610 needed?).
Okay, thanks. My last attempt wasn't succesful, but I'll try again.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
he autobuilder. I will
add it back in now.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
roblems.
Since the Hurd now has an autobuilder (Tracking about 10% of the
packages and growing) this is going to become a bigger problem soon.
What's the best way to get one of the proposals put forward?
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 07:48:39PM +0200, David Spreen wrote:
> The LIDS packages in the debian distribution are built for all architectures.
> No I would like to know if Anyone has seen it running on any other
> architecture than i386.
> Additionaly I would be glad to see porters of other archit
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Michel Ddnzer wrote:
> > > For s390 binaries, I decided to compile the binaries on 'autobuilder'
> > > plan, on my S/390 machine.
> > >
> > > And then, Who do I have to contact? I remember having ever listened that
> > > someone use it on sparc-ports.
> >
9 matches
Mail list logo
