On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 07:16:35PM +1000, Steven Hanley wrote:
> All
>
> I have a 7200/120 here with its standard 500 MB disk, I was able to pull a 2
> GB disk out of a broken 7300/200. I just put the 2 GB disk in and plugged both
> disks into the cables there inside the case. NOw booting into lin
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 10:42:36PM -0400, Russell Hires wrote:
> OTOH, maybe it's just a bad message: it tells
> you false information.
No, in this case it was quite clearly correct. The zdaemon would
totally fail to start because it couldn't get the local host's name.
> My Zope works fine on m
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 06:26:59PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Yeah, /etc/hosts is one of those things you check without thinking
> about it...
>
> Why not just point it to 127.0.0.1?
In fact, I thought of that immediately after making my last post,
but didn't think it was worth bugging the list f
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 04:47:04PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Is the zopectl command a binary or is it a script? If it's a script,
> you could add "set -x" at line 2 of the script to be able to debug it.
Hm, I mustn't have been thinking it through clearly. I should've
thought of that.
Ultimatel
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 12:52:41PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Do you have another PPC machine you can test this on?
Unfortunately, no.
> Have you ruled out any hardware problems?
I cannot imagine what hardware problem would cause this. The hardware
seems to function fine in other respects. It
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 08:24:55PM +0200, Stefan Heimann wrote:
> > # zopectl start
> > Starting Zope failed.
>
> Maybe another service uses the ports (for http it's usually 8080, for
> fto 8021) Zope tries to listen on.
Nope, that's not it. Zope has chang
I'm mystified. I just installed zope 2.3.3-1 both on a ppc box and i386
and it starts on the latter, but not the former.
The ppc (woody) box:
ii python-base1.5.2-16 An interactive object-oriented scripting lan
ii zope 2.3.3-1The Z Object Publishing Environment
ii l
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Matthew Franz wrote:
> Would its "raw material" be pre-compiled debian binary packages or would
> it be able to build the system from source. Unless there were separate
> embedded .debs, I don't know that the standard binaries would be compact
> enough to support limited memor
8 matches
Mail list logo
