On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 02:10:11 +0200, Torsten Zirzlaff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi.
>
>AlexB schrieb:
>> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:40:06 +0200, Torsten Zirzlaff
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>[...]
>>
>> I had same issue when I tried to p
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 04:40:06 +0200, Torsten Zirzlaff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi.
>
>I have serious problems installing Etch on a RS/6000 B80 (I presume).
>The install with the net-install image boots fine and the ppc64 kernel
>works fine during install. But when I'm finished with the install
Good day everyone,
just managed to install Debian unstable to an IBM p570 LPAR. Generally
installation went OK, although Debian installer complained about inability to
finish installation of uw-imapd at the end; also installer complained about
inability to install linux kernel properly, but kernel
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:20:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> vi /tmp/deb/etc/yaboot.conf
>> >>
>> >> then:
>> >> mkdir /tmp/deb/ppc
>> >>
>> >> and save file, attached to this message as /tmp/deb/ppc/bootinfo.txt
>> >> this file is needed by IBM Open Firmware to find yaboot boot loader
>>
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:20:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:23:34PM +0300, AlexB wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 12:34:21PM +0300, AlexB wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:20:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>&g
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:10:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 12:34:21PM +0300, AlexB wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:20:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >In reading the Installation manual for both 3.0 and 3.1 it says that
>> >&
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:34:21 +0300, AlexB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:20:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>My H50 vendor wants to ensure that the unit will boot the Debian 3.1
>>install before he ships the unit. He says
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:34:21 +0300, AlexB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:20:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>My H50 vendor wants to ensure that the unit will boot the Debian 3.1
>>install before he ships the unit. He says
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:20:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello,
>
>My H50 vendor wants to ensure that the unit will boot the Debian 3.1
>install before he ships the unit. He says he can't get it to and
>suspects he is not making the CD correctly since his running systems are
>windows.
>
>In
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:40:19 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Thank you for the reply about the H50 vs the F50. Its good to have
>confirmation; I had verified with the vendor that the parts are
>interchangeabe and figured it would work.
>
>I'm a little confused on the boot loader. I got interest
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:50:07 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've been wanting to switch to the PowerPC architecture to keep the
>excellent reliability I've had from my now 15 year old IBM server (486).
>The best deal I have found for $750 CDN is a 7026-H50 in an S00 rack.
>I think I've
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:40:11 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:53:49PM +0300, AlexB wrote:
>> Good day,
>>
>> cannot find any reference to successful installation of IBM ServeRAID adapter
>> for RS/6000 machine with Linux
Good day,
cannot find any reference to successful installation of IBM ServeRAID adapter
for RS/6000 machine with Linux. I am not using Debian linux (it is rather Red
Hat FC5-ppc) but I presume kernel/drivers are more or less the same. Managed to
start Debian netinst CD for PPC platform (version 3.
13 matches
Mail list logo
