Re: libglib2.0-0t64 vs libglib2.0-0 dependencies

2024-10-29 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello Ed, On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 13:25 +, Ed Robbins wrote: > I have noticed that there have been a few broken packages on the > repository for some time, that presumably need to be rebuilt or fixed > after libglib2.0 moved to t64. Notably I have been wanting to install > xpra for a while but i

Re: libglib2.0-0t64 vs libglib2.0-0 dependencies

2024-10-29 Thread Ed Robbins
29 Oct 2024 14:12:09 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : > On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 15:10 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> Such situations can occur when the package in question or one of its build >> dependencies didn't build successfully. > > The former is true: > https://buildd.debian.org/statu

Re: libglib2.0-0t64 vs libglib2.0-0 dependencies

2024-10-29 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 15:10 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Such situations can occur when the package in question or one of its build > dependencies didn't build successfully. The former is true: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xpra&suite=sid On this page, you will two

libglib2.0-0t64 vs libglib2.0-0 dependencies

2024-10-29 Thread Ed Robbins
Hi all, I have noticed that there have been a few broken packages on the repository for some time, that presumably need to be rebuilt or fixed after libglib2.0 moved to t64. Notably I have been wanting to install xpra for a while but it has not been updated. Is this a problem specific to our port

Re: Boot failure with ppc64 port on iMacs G5

2024-10-29 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Michael, On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 12:57 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Yep, the second, older image works as expected. However, the recent one > > does not > > and I have absolutely no clue why. > > I actually tested both, and both work, but then I cited the wrong one in > my email >_< > >