Hello and big thanks to both!
That fixed the issue.
Best wishes,
Ilko
Simon McVittie dixit:
>was rather recent at that time, but hopefully we no longer have any
>machines that are running Debian 8 kernels...
The varios MIPS buildds run 4.19 and some even 4.9 kernels
(AFAIHH due to hardware/patch constraints), which has led
to problems (e.g. I had to disable klibc b
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 at 00:59:30 +0100, Jessica Clarke wrote:
> On 20 Aug 2024, at 00:23, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I was unable to reproduce this build failure
...
> > There must presumably be something different about how sbuild-createchroot
> > and schroot are configured or invoked on the affect
On 20 Aug 2024, at 00:23, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> I'm using Thorsten's regression report in #983423 as my representative
> sample of a package that regressed with schroot 1.6.13-4, because mksh
> builds much more quickly than gcc-14, but I suspect that the same would
> apply equally to Adrian's
Hi Simon,
thanks for testing.
>I'm using Thorsten's regression report in #983423 as my representative
>sample of a package that regressed with schroot 1.6.13-4, because mksh
>builds much more quickly than gcc-14
(You can add mksh-firstbuilt to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS so it doesn’t build
and test binar
I'm using Thorsten's regression report in #983423 as my representative
sample of a package that regressed with schroot 1.6.13-4, because mksh
builds much more quickly than gcc-14, but I suspect that the same would
apply equally to Adrian's regression report in #856877: the important
factor is proba
Simon McVittie dixit:
>On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 16:27:24 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> mksh actually does things inside script(1) that use the tty
>
>For the purposes of having a test-case for schroot that doesn't require
>mksh, perhaps a good approximation to this would be asserting that
>tty(1)
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 16:27:24 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> mksh actually does things inside script(1) that use the tty
For the purposes of having a test-case for schroot that doesn't require
mksh, perhaps a good approximation to this would be asserting that
tty(1) from coreutils exits success
Simon McVittie dixit:
>On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 at 23:44:57 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> On three buildds, mksh FTBFS already because the whole
>> /dev/ptmx and /dev/pts stuff is malfunctioning again
>
>Which buildds? Are you referring to -ports builds
>https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pk
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 at 23:44:57 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On three buildds, mksh FTBFS already because the whole
> /dev/ptmx and /dev/pts stuff is malfunctioning again
Which buildds? Are you referring to -ports builds
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mksh&arch=powerpc&ver=59c-3
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 14:56 +0300, ilko Iliev wrote:
> Unfortunately that doesn't work because I can't install absolutely anything,
> it always fails with the same error as stated in OP:
> sudo apt-get install hfsprogs
Then download the package manually and install it with "dpkg".
# apt d
Hi Ilko,
Le Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 02:56:25PM +0300, ilko Iliev a écrit :
Thanks for the suggestion but regarding: >You must install the
package “hfsprogs”, then run:
# umount /boot/grub
# fsck.hfs -y /dev/sda2
# mount -a
# dpkg-configure -a
Unfortunately that doesn't work because I can
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the suggestion but regarding: >You must install the package
“hfsprogs”, then run:
>
># umount /boot/grub
># fsck.hfs -y /dev/sda2
># mount -a
># dpkg-configure -a
Unfortunately that doesn't work because I can't install absolutely anything,
it always fails with th
13 matches
Mail list logo
