Hi,
On 10/12/20 at 22:16 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 12/10/20 10:12 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores?
> >
> > No idea
>
> I just checked plummer.debian.org and it has only 16 (virtual) CPUs.
>
> Would be curious
On 12/10/20 10:16 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores?
>>
>> No idea
>
> But given that there is only a single test, I wonder if that is really
> relevant anyway.
You're right. That's rather strange. Hmm.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian
Am 10.12.20 um 22:12 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233
=
Hi!
On 12/10/20 10:12 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Did the test machine you used actually have that many cores?
>
> No idea
I just checked plummer.debian.org and it has only 16 (virtual) CPUs.
Would be curious to hear whether Lucas' test machine had >= 160 CPUs.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Ad
Am 10.12.20 um 22:10 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 8:42 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Testsuite summary for systemd-bootchart 233
>
> # TOTAL: 1
> # PASS: 1
> # SKIP: 0
>
Am 10.12.20 um 20:18 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the issue on a porter box (plummer).
So I'm not sure if I can do something about it.
It might be an issue with parallel jobs as Lucas built the packag
Hi Michael!
On 12/10/20 7:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the issue on a porter box (plummer).
> So I'm not sure if I can do something about it.
It might be an issue with parallel jobs as Lucas built the package with
make -j160 and some packages can't cope with that
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
Hello Lucas
Am 09.12.20 um 09:42 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
Source: systemd-bootchart
Version: 233-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el
Hi,
During a rebuild of all pack
"make -j160"
that would be my guess :)
remove parallel from the dh option, and try again (fixes symptoms)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:49 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to investigate the situation below and my guess is that lex has
> somehow problems to cre
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I tried to investigate the situation below and my guess is that lex has
somehow problems to create the missing header files. I've found the
files in upstreams .gitignore file so these need to be created but this
does not seem to work on ppc64el (any more - since the pac
11 matches
Mail list logo