> On Aug 27, 2018, at 9:44 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 6:54 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/25/18 10:54 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
2) Firefox segfaults when I start it, either from command line or from the
system menu. Is this a
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 6:54 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
> On 8/25/18 10:54 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> 2) Firefox segfaults when I start it, either from command line or from the
>>> system menu. Is this a known bug? Are there any other graphical (i.e.,
>>> non-tex
On 08/27/2018 11:09 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 8/28/18 5:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Guess not.
Explanation here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2017/12/msg00060.html
Oh, FWIW, you need to install the version from experimental.
# apt install firefox -t=experi
On 8/28/18 5:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Guess not.
>
> Explanation here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2017/12/msg00060.html
Oh, FWIW, you need to install the version from experimental.
# apt install firefox -t=experimental
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
On 8/28/18 4:35 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> root@nix:~# apt-get install firefox
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using t
On 08/27/2018 09:54 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 8/25/18 10:54 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
2) Firefox segfaults when I start it, either from command line or from the
system menu. Is this a known bug? Are there any other graphical (i.e.,
non-text-mode) browsers I can use
On 8/25/18 10:54 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> 2) Firefox segfaults when I start it, either from command line or from the
>> system menu. Is this a known bug? Are there any other graphical (i.e.,
>> non-text-mode) browsers I can use instead? I can use elinks for most
>> things, but
I can try just about anything on my G5. It exists strictly for testing, right
now.
If you can point me to a .deb with the patch that I can install, I’ll be happy
to test it.
Rick
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 6:41 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
> On 8/28/18 3:36 AM, John Paul Adrian Gla
On 8/28/18 3:36 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> You can try to figure out what the actual change was. So, for example, if you
> find out what in the windfarm module configuration has changed, I can open a
> merge request for the linux kernel package on salsa.debian.org which is
> actually
>
On 8/28/18 3:28 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. Can I assume that you will be following up on
> this? If not, I’ll understand — bandwidth is in short supply for all of us.
> Should I file a bug report — if so, to what package? Sadly, I don’t have the
> expertise to follo
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 1:34 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> If it is a bug, it’s a minor one, and it’s easily worked around by the
>> addition to /etc/modules. But I’m curious to know what changed? If it is a
>> name change, as Adrian suggests, I’m curious to know what chang
On 8/27/18 8:49 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> I was aware of that package being for powerpc, which is not a release-arch.
> The upload is just for completeness - as for many other d-i packages, to
> update
> the alioth URLs in debian/control to Salsa:
Odd, to my surprise it did actually work. Acco
[ Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed to this list ]
Hi!
I was investigating issue #907239 (LDC ftbfs on ppc64el), filing an
upstream issue for it[1].
Upstream now suggests to drop support for the powerpc/ppc64el
architecture entirely, due to the maintenance cost and the fact the
issue won't
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 8/27/18 7:55 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > yaboot-installer_1.1.40_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> > along with the files:
> > yaboot-installer_1.1.40.dsc
> > yaboot-installer_1.1.40.tar.xz
> > yaboot-installer_1.1.40_powerpc
On 8/27/18 7:55 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> yaboot-installer_1.1.40_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> along with the files:
> yaboot-installer_1.1.40.dsc
> yaboot-installer_1.1.40.tar.xz
> yaboot-installer_1.1.40_powerpc.buildinfo
This is not going to work. yaboot-insta
On 08/27/2018 05:18 AM, Bas Vermeulen wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Your modules aren't stripped, which is what causes the huge initrd.
Try:
make INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 modules_install
instead of
make modules_install
to fix this.
A switch to just the required "dep" modules resulted in a small enough
initrd
On 27/08/18 10:39, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Christian,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:32 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
>> wrote:
>>> There is certainly a way to automate this, but my question on whether
>>> that seque
Christian,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:32 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> wrote:
> > There is certainly a way to automate this, but my question on whether
> > that sequence would fix the problem was intended to more easily fi
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM Linux User #330250
wrote:
>
> Am 26.08.18 um 14:07 schrieb Frank Scheiner:
> > On 08/26/2018 01:35 PM, Linux User #330250 wrote:
> >> Am 26.08.18 um 12:48 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> >>> One of the most pressing problems on Debian powerpc/ppc64 is
> >>> the
Hi Dennis,
Your modules aren't stripped, which is what causes the huge initrd.
Try:
make INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 modules_install
instead of
make modules_install
to fix this.
Bas Vermeulen
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 26, 2018, at 1:25 AM, Mark G.B. wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rick and everyone,
>>
>> It’s a bug (IMHO). Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, though.
>>
>> Attached here are two images of the Debian-powerpc64 specific kernel-config
>>
On Aug 26, 2018, at 1:25 AM, Mark G.B. wrote:
> Hi Rick and everyone,
>
> It’s a bug (IMHO). Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, though.
>
> Attached here are two images of the Debian-powerpc64 specific kernel-config
> extracted from the .deb package of the Linux-image package off of
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
